From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] vfio: selftests: Export more vfio_pci functions
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 22:55:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aV7kScUBdrYdKCPE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210181417.3677674-5-rananta@google.com>
On 2025-12-10 06:14 PM, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
shotlog nit: "Expose more vfio_pci_device functions"
> Refactor and make the functions called under device initialization
> public. A later patch adds a test that calls these functions to validate
> the UAPI of SR-IOV devices. Opportunistically, to test the success
> and failure cases of the UAPI, split the functions dealing with
> VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD and VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD into a core
> function and another one that asserts the ioctl. The former will be
> used for testing the SR-IOV UAPI, hence only export these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
> ---
> .../lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h | 7 +++
> .../selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c | 44 ++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h
> index 2858885a89bbb..6186ca463ca6e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h
> @@ -122,4 +122,11 @@ static inline bool vfio_pci_device_match(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
>
> const char *vfio_pci_get_cdev_path(const char *bdf);
>
> +void vfio_pci_group_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device, const char *bdf);
> +void __vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> + const char *bdf, const char *vf_token);
> +void vfio_container_set_iommu(struct vfio_pci_device *device);
> +void vfio_pci_iommufd_cdev_open(struct vfio_pci_device *device, const char *bdf);
> +int __vfio_device_bind_iommufd(int device_fd, int iommufd, const char *vf_token);
> +
> #endif /* SELFTESTS_VFIO_LIB_INCLUDE_LIBVFIO_VFIO_PCI_DEVICE_H */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> index ac9a5244ddc46..208da2704d9e2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ void vfio_pci_device_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *device)
> ioctl_assert(device->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET, NULL);
> }
>
> -static void vfio_pci_group_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device, const char *bdf)
> +void vfio_pci_group_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device, const char *bdf)
> {
> struct vfio_group_status group_status = {
> .argsz = sizeof(group_status),
> @@ -200,8 +200,8 @@ static void vfio_pci_group_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device, const char *bdf
> ioctl_assert(device->group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER, &device->iommu->container_fd);
> }
>
> -static void vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> - const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> +void __vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> + const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> {
> char arg[64] = {0};
>
> @@ -216,18 +216,21 @@ static void vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> snprintf(arg, ARRAY_SIZE(arg), "%s", bdf);
>
> device->fd = ioctl(device->group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> + const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> +{
> + __vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(device, bdf, vf_token);
> VFIO_ASSERT_GE(device->fd, 0);
> }
>
> -static void vfio_pci_container_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> - const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> +void vfio_container_set_iommu(struct vfio_pci_device *device)
> {
> struct iommu *iommu = device->iommu;
> unsigned long iommu_type = iommu->mode->iommu_type;
> int ret;
>
> - vfio_pci_group_setup(device, bdf);
> -
> ret = ioctl(iommu->container_fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, iommu_type);
> VFIO_ASSERT_GT(ret, 0, "VFIO IOMMU type %lu not supported\n", iommu_type);
>
> @@ -237,7 +240,13 @@ static void vfio_pci_container_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> * because the IOMMU type is already set.
> */
> (void)ioctl(iommu->container_fd, VFIO_SET_IOMMU, (void *)iommu_type);
> +}
>
> +static void vfio_pci_container_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> + const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> +{
> + vfio_pci_group_setup(device, bdf);
> + vfio_container_set_iommu(device);
> vfio_pci_group_get_device_fd(device, bdf, vf_token);
> }
>
> @@ -299,8 +308,7 @@ const char *vfio_pci_get_cdev_path(const char *bdf)
> return cdev_path;
> }
>
> -static void vfio_device_bind_iommufd(int device_fd, int iommufd,
> - const char *vf_token)
> +int __vfio_device_bind_iommufd(int device_fd, int iommufd, const char *vf_token)
> {
> struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd args = {
> .argsz = sizeof(args),
> @@ -314,7 +322,15 @@ static void vfio_device_bind_iommufd(int device_fd, int iommufd,
> args.token_uuid_ptr = (u64)token_uuid;
> }
>
> - ioctl_assert(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD, &args);
> + return ioctl(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD, &args);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_device_bind_iommufd(int device_fd, int iommufd,
> + const char *vf_token)
> +{
> + int ret = __vfio_device_bind_iommufd(device_fd, iommufd, vf_token);
> +
> + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0, "Failed VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl\n");
> }
>
> static void vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt(int device_fd, u32 pt_id)
> @@ -327,15 +343,19 @@ static void vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt(int device_fd, u32 pt_id)
> ioctl_assert(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT, &args);
> }
>
> -static void vfio_pci_iommufd_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> - const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> +void vfio_pci_iommufd_cdev_open(struct vfio_pci_device *device, const char *bdf)
nit: vfio_pci_cdev_open()
Opening the cdev doesn't interact with iommufd in the kernel in any way.
It's a pure VFIO operation. So having iommufd in the name here might be
confusing.
> {
> const char *cdev_path = vfio_pci_get_cdev_path(bdf);
>
> device->fd = open(cdev_path, O_RDWR);
> VFIO_ASSERT_GE(device->fd, 0);
> free((void *)cdev_path);
> +}
>
> +static void vfio_pci_iommufd_setup(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> + const char *bdf, const char *vf_token)
> +{
> + vfio_pci_iommufd_cdev_open(device, bdf);
> vfio_device_bind_iommufd(device->fd, device->iommu->iommufd, vf_token);
> vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt(device->fd, device->iommu->ioas_id);
> }
> --
> 2.52.0.239.gd5f0c6e74e-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 18:14 [PATCH v2 0/6] vfio: selftest: Add SR-IOV UAPI test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] vfio: selftests: Introduce snprintf_assert() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-01-07 22:21 ` David Matlack
2025-12-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] vfio: selftests: Introduce a sysfs lib Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-12 18:27 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-18 21:52 ` David Matlack
2026-01-07 22:41 ` David Matlack
2026-01-08 21:25 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] vfio: selftests: Extend container/iommufd setup for passing vf_token Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-01-07 22:49 ` David Matlack
2026-01-08 21:34 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] vfio: selftests: Export more vfio_pci functions Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-01-07 22:55 ` David Matlack [this message]
2026-01-07 23:05 ` David Matlack
2026-01-08 21:47 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] vfio: selftests: Add helper to set/override a vf_token Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-01-07 22:56 ` David Matlack
2026-01-08 21:45 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-01-14 17:12 ` David Matlack
2025-12-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] vfio: selftests: Add tests to validate SR-IOV UAPI Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-12 18:21 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-12-18 23:26 ` David Matlack
2026-01-06 19:47 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-02-05 21:51 ` David Matlack
2026-02-23 18:57 ` David Matlack
2026-01-07 23:22 ` David Matlack
2026-01-09 19:05 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2026-01-14 17:09 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aV7kScUBdrYdKCPE@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox