Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

Hello,

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:43:14PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> +   Once ``ops.enqueue()`` is called, the task is considered "enqueued" and
> +   is owned by the BPF scheduler. Ownership is retained until the task is

Can we avoid using "ownership" for this? From user's POV, this is fine but
kernel side internally uses the word for different purposes - e.g. we say
the BPF side owns the task if the task's SCX_OPSS_QUEUED is set (ie. it's on
BPF data structure, not on a DSQ). Here, the ownership encompasses both
kernel-side and BPF-side queueing, so the term becomes rather confusing.
Maybe we can stick with "queued" or "enqueued"?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun