public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: drop NOLIBC_SYSROOT=0 logic
@ 2026-01-04 14:57 Thomas Weißschuh
  2026-01-04 16:43 ` Willy Tarreau
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-04 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Willy Tarreau, Shuah Khan
  Cc: linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh

This logic was added in commit 850fad7de827 ("selftests/nolibc: allow
test -include /path/to/nolibc.h") to allow the testing of -include
/path/to/nolibc.h. As it requires as special variable to activate, this
code is nearly never used. Furthermore it complicates the logic a bit.

Since commit a6a054c8ad32 ("tools/nolibc: add target to check header
usability") and commit 443c6467fcd6 ("selftests/nolibc: always run
nolibc header check") the usability of -include /path/to/nolibc.h is
always checked anyways, making NOLIBC_SYSROOT=0 pointless.

Drop the special logic.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc
index f9d43cbdc894..b17ba2f8fb46 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc
@@ -302,15 +302,9 @@ sysroot/$(ARCH)/include:
 	$(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/include/nolibc ARCH=$(ARCH) OUTPUT=$(CURDIR)/sysroot/ headers_standalone headers_check
 	$(Q)mv sysroot/sysroot sysroot/$(ARCH)
 
-ifneq ($(NOLIBC_SYSROOT),0)
 nolibc-test: nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c sysroot/$(ARCH)/include
 	$(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ \
 	  -nostdlib -nostdinc -static -Isysroot/$(ARCH)/include nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c $(LIBGCC)
-else
-nolibc-test: nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c
-	$(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ \
-	  -nostdlib -static -include $(srctree)/tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c $(LIBGCC)
-endif
 
 libc-test: nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c
 	$(QUIET_CC)$(HOSTCC) -o $@ nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c

---
base-commit: 9d16b22b17ddfd27df1da6088a962a72658f46d1
change-id: 20260104-nolibc-nolibc_sysroot-deb36526dcd3

Best regards,
-- 
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: drop NOLIBC_SYSROOT=0 logic
  2026-01-04 14:57 [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: drop NOLIBC_SYSROOT=0 logic Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2026-01-04 16:43 ` Willy Tarreau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Willy Tarreau @ 2026-01-04 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: Shuah Khan, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel

On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 03:57:51PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> This logic was added in commit 850fad7de827 ("selftests/nolibc: allow
> test -include /path/to/nolibc.h") to allow the testing of -include
> /path/to/nolibc.h. As it requires as special variable to activate, this
> code is nearly never used. Furthermore it complicates the logic a bit.
> 
> Since commit a6a054c8ad32 ("tools/nolibc: add target to check header
> usability") and commit 443c6467fcd6 ("selftests/nolibc: always run
> nolibc header check") the usability of -include /path/to/nolibc.h is
> always checked anyways, making NOLIBC_SYSROOT=0 pointless.
> 
> Drop the special logic.

I think that it was historically needed when we used to build by doing
-include nolibc.h but now that we've adopted most of the common headers,
we no longer build that way and instead use the sysroot, so yes, let's
drop this.

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

Willy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-04 16:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-04 14:57 [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: drop NOLIBC_SYSROOT=0 logic Thomas Weißschuh
2026-01-04 16:43 ` Willy Tarreau

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox