public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Armin Wolf <w_armin@gmx.de>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Documentation: driver-api: Disapprove of using ACPI drivers
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:50:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVvd0eYC7Qs5_ZdD@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026010553-capable-chip-88d7@gregkh>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 02:47:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 12:25:04PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Documenting this is fine, but really, just moving all of the existing
> drivers to not use this and deleting the api entirely might be simplest.
> Looks like the only "new" acpi drivers that show up are in the
> platform/x86/ subsystem, so just tell the maintainers there not to take
> any new ones?

I believe that with or without documentation this will take a few cycles
to get rid of (as there are more than just the PDx86 being involved as of
today). Also there were (and might be in the future) a few attempts to convert
in the opposite direction, i.e. from platform to ACPI driver. Doing something
temporary for a few cycles is okay, no? From my point of view it helps avoiding
the above mentioned cases.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-05 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-05 11:25 [PATCH v1] ACPI: Documentation: driver-api: Disapprove of using ACPI drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-01-05 13:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-05 15:50   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-01-05 16:47     ` Armin Wolf
2026-01-05 17:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-01-05 15:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-05 18:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-01-05 16:51 ` Armin Wolf
2026-01-05 19:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-01-05 19:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aVvd0eYC7Qs5_ZdD@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=w_armin@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox