From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
brauner@kernel.org, mjguzik@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz,
joel.granados@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+e0378d4f4fe57aa2bdd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork/pid: Fix use-after-free in __task_pid_nr_ns
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 10:04:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVzQEXa6eLhqmul_@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260105043627.1758935-1-wangqing7171@gmail.com>
On 01/05, Qing Wang wrote:
>
> The race condition occurs between the failure path of copy_process() and
> getting the PIDTYPE_TGID via __task_pid_nr_ns().
>
> Bug timeline:
> Task B
> perf_event_open()
> Task A <--------------------------- clone()
> copy_process()
> perf_event_init_task()
> ...
> one copy failed
> free_signal_struct() close(event_fd)
> perf_child_detach()
> __task_pid_nr_ns()
> access child task->signal
Sorry, this description very confusing to me... Is it Task B who does
clone? Or another Task A does copy_process() ? Could you write a more
clear changelog?
> bad_fork_cleanup_signal:
> - if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD))
> - free_signal_struct(p->signal);
> + if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)) {
> + free_sig = p->signal;
> + p->signal = NULL;
> + free_signal_struct(free_sig);
> + }
> bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
> __cleanup_sighand(p->sighand);
> bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
> diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> index a31771bc89c1..1a012e033552 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_vpid);
>
> static struct pid **task_pid_ptr(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type)
> {
> - return (type == PIDTYPE_PID) ?
> - &task->thread_pid :
> - &task->signal->pids[type];
> + if (type == PIDTYPE_PID)
> + return &task->thread_pid;
> + return task->signal ? &task->signal->pids[type] : NULL;
> }
At first glance this is racy. Can't task->signal be freed right after
the check?
And... Can't we make another fix? If copy_process() fails and does
free_signal_struct(), the child has not been added to rcu protected
lists and init_task_pid(child) was not called yet.
So perhaps something like the patch below can work?
Oleg.
---
--- x/kernel/events/core.c
+++ x/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1422,16 +1422,17 @@ unclone_ctx(struct perf_event_context *c
static u32 perf_event_pid_type(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *p,
enum pid_type type)
{
- u32 nr;
+ u32 nr = 0;
/*
* only top level events have the pid namespace they were created in
*/
if (event->parent)
event = event->parent;
- nr = __task_pid_nr_ns(p, type, event->ns);
+ if (pid_alive(p))
+ nr = __task_pid_nr_ns(p, type, event->ns);
/* avoid -1 if it is idle thread or runs in another ns */
- if (!nr && !pid_alive(p))
+ if (!nr)
nr = -1;
return nr;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-05 4:36 [PATCH] fork/pid: Fix use-after-free in __task_pid_nr_ns Qing Wang
2026-01-05 22:46 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-06 7:07 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-06 9:04 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-01-06 10:06 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-06 10:26 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-06 10:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-01-06 10:58 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-06 11:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-01-07 2:43 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-06 12:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-01-07 9:40 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-07 14:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-01-07 9:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] <20260105045609.1764387-1-wangqing7171@gmail.com>
2026-01-07 20:39 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-08 2:15 ` Qing Wang
2026-01-08 3:44 ` Qing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVzQEXa6eLhqmul_@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+e0378d4f4fe57aa2bdd0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wangqing7171@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox