From: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>,
Aashish Sharma <aashish@aashishsharma.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down context entry
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:07:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aW-MBQg5q4SCivbk@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120061816.2132558-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 02:18:13PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> When tearing down a context entry, the current implementation zeros the
> entire 128-bit entry using multiple 64-bit writes. This creates a window
> where the hardware can fetch a "torn" entry — where some fields are
> already zeroed while the 'Present' bit is still set — leading to
> unpredictable behavior or spurious faults.
>
> While x86 provides strong write ordering, the compiler may reorder writes
> to the two 64-bit halves of the context entry. Even without compiler
> reordering, the hardware fetch is not guaranteed to be atomic with
> respect to multiple CPU writes.
>
> Align with the "Guidance to Software for Invalidations" in the VT-d spec
> (Section 6.5.3.3) by implementing the recommended ownership handshake:
>
> 1. Clear only the 'Present' (P) bit of the context entry first to
> signal the transition of ownership from hardware to software.
> 2. Use dma_wmb() to ensure the cleared bit is visible to the IOMMU.
> 3. Perform the required cache and context-cache invalidation to ensure
> hardware no longer has cached references to the entry.
> 4. Fully zero out the entry only after the invalidation is complete.
>
> Also, add a dma_wmb() to context_set_present() to ensure the entry
> is fully initialized before the 'Present' bit becomes visible.
>
> Fixes: ba39592764ed2 ("Intel IOMMU: Intel IOMMU driver")
> Reported-by: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTG7gc7I5wExai3S@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> index 25c5e22096d4..599913fb65d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> @@ -900,7 +900,26 @@ static inline int pfn_level_offset(u64 pfn, int level)
>
> static inline void context_set_present(struct context_entry *context)
> {
> - context->lo |= 1;
> + u64 val;
> +
> + dma_wmb();
> + val = READ_ONCE(context->lo) | 1;
As IIRC Jason noted, READ_ONCE is not really necessary?
> + WRITE_ONCE(context->lo, val);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Clear the Present (P) bit (bit 0) of a context table entry. This initiates
> + * the transition of the entry's ownership from hardware to software. The
> + * caller is responsible for fulfilling the invalidation handshake recommended
> + * by the VT-d spec, Section 6.5.3.3 (Guidance to Software for Invalidations).
> + */
> +static inline void context_clear_present(struct context_entry *context)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + val = READ_ONCE(context->lo) & GENMASK_ULL(63, 1);
Maybe "& ~1ULL" would be a bit more readable? (and READ_ONCE not
necessary here either?)
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>
> + WRITE_ONCE(context->lo, val);
> + dma_wmb();
> }
>
> static inline void context_set_fault_enable(struct context_entry *context)
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 134302fbcd92..c66cc51f9e51 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -1240,10 +1240,12 @@ static void domain_context_clear_one(struct device_domain_info *info, u8 bus, u8
> }
>
> did = context_domain_id(context);
> - context_clear_entry(context);
> + context_clear_present(context);
> __iommu_flush_cache(iommu, context, sizeof(*context));
> spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> intel_context_flush_no_pasid(info, context, did);
> + context_clear_entry(context);
> + __iommu_flush_cache(iommu, context, sizeof(*context));
> }
>
> int __domain_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 6:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/vt-d: Ensure atomicity in context and PASID entry updates Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down PASID entry Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 13:56 ` Dmytro Maluka
2026-01-20 18:14 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-01-21 6:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down context entry Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 14:07 ` Dmytro Maluka [this message]
2026-01-20 18:22 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-01-21 6:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-21 7:28 ` Baolu Lu
2026-01-21 7:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-21 8:04 ` Baolu Lu
2026-01-21 8:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/vt-d: Fix race condition during PASID entry replacement Lu Baolu
2026-01-20 18:54 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-01-21 6:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-01-20 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/vt-d: Ensure atomicity in context and PASID entry updates Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aW-MBQg5q4SCivbk@google.com \
--to=dmaluka@chromium.org \
--cc=aashish@aashishsharma.net \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox