From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5D327E05F for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 23:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.47 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768865859; cv=none; b=CKjyCD1ePfKHUfEZV4iOknUYBxddzPKkMud50DTyUxzTYVjELmfmBn60nlwYkkaomYU/47ymRB2fMP8OC+laJXp4lOjagxK+XgZpWFXXrroSgCB2UOk/bsnfkvsB+Gu7wiNvv/DXxfCRBTUEKo+CRo+RaYPxfo4QholMCUy1of8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768865859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aDfnM7i9GGpQDHaGMBkiIsynJa7STOxJiG3hr1rIu1s=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EhtwyxXk8/+Ez7nfxJWPiVjg3Mp+xYHZVRQzi22jSYHfa0SgiGewUl9zjtUG19Lc/AyLnlbPBO6SqB6g7oIvU+tOEIC0CTELXBTbcFFiT9ZDGzzIbnSwokDQHoHONVij7T6ugSS2fdxZQU5pXTqaMeb7sPE1IEaRpGpsXh9mcEg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Z5DMl1E0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Z5DMl1E0" Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43284ed32a0so2665172f8f.3 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:37:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1768865855; x=1769470655; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1JfOnVqkCeNateHhFiNeNhXc5NJwePi9FKodOPEv0No=; b=Z5DMl1E08+VNpnLOt3VF/wp6VswTXOu5UPnjlsugmANXWk4rLdDmGwYuqxUcQyXljx 94Vfyto/XIfZ+ivUu3TGcDltzD/yUJELkTbsh9LpcnCNo43W7u7qLgdcnd8CRKv34JaA /xw/ZNw4BOkXGRpNbmPfRa1cA2qqEVm1Jmgw8gFcW3YEbUX6L1PDPiNME0c4tDjH/UGQ oV3IZbS1A8e8FF5fipkE3+08f8oTIJSw2OP9tSrgd4MWn335h4m7yo6MPH40K2EFp2Hf D8TCk/KetpLdnxE5hK7a1YXtkVs15fnvmLwLyGxjhqOerDYe50o58lXDv3G0vBHEzyz9 LdpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768865855; x=1769470655; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1JfOnVqkCeNateHhFiNeNhXc5NJwePi9FKodOPEv0No=; b=ECcIQfXCTjai8G2AdoXQIDI/0etBV/xI39iFi87c7ShENVD7rb0DA0PjSMFML1wau9 33mV8+S2imi9Ybd35bFjonYct02IV3rpdiBw8i3IkS/AGHk55HgaIa5JYGnbIcGb6mk3 iUti3nAoc9EE6GZbSV17pVx8fGkYu32m8R7FGKm4njCqVBPQ/iq7LMRhI8Vl6kWb63pK LSjxuGLX4G0o/IDQ1NT+j/PdpWD2NW+DwFSjO0t9q5G8SxdPnGVHTeS7ypKvPe2N4o9N h87WHgSMFEp2Be7hlZw7d9U9wzmErv9uMFWgFbycq7sXqoGlOcRY3jdHuxA8yQFzjw6N PBHQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWl4PpSkqEFYziahTwqc4D6nwV5mOrEuhknupRtOuVx74UYjDlfHHBsT31dEzdWiFk+AyHNEVxWdta0HwA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1ZyUjQbdb0GiYM3Dzkl+ol0WuJXq06d7jIDZVvYBwtbED4KFN ib6qdEulbZiPVC2VU5rm3ZngLmZWsPer7aOC0ZCiUKmBzvZWfEN9x2ch X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aJmFnfxsJT58spntl8D3xeU1NwyPBHcCjbqrjKwM2hr4Fpc6pJ0pT1wr9IGA+J d7TeZFZjeKr3QokxmHJ2ir7JBB/1jPeE2lHiSmeEAbOx9Tr1x1kfZd/eqJY2S8NA6g6D4DSEkLf WXU7Y6EMTMifhYc2hZjk5flxBqIpYpa1K9CvbLK8zswEmO2VbpackmEIsQK0QcaFzD42DK0ddBv InqAu1jgvx++snQPbpS/EG/Br0r9/gk/2xTQqmrQfNyRxNrJ2S3nzcFYwmqOyx81tBip8kMrmi0 PaKm6a242BNcB2Sm6ONOeTrXTr3bipfaB/S7vx0/bZ7Pk7nwajP+qqQTqoT6VGcLqFMElbJY7Sa 0O3YTZ6jNsrWJ0Zl1HjzPkn2pojE2iKj1fQVJdhWkYit+7eGFc/j3OsvlcY3YX4EP6ZX3P0NjlW bArp2oIhrEfw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2903:b0:432:c05b:d8c7 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43569bc7761mr15761095f8f.49.1768865855030; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:37:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from krava ([176.74.159.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4356992c6f2sm25306953f8f.19.2026.01.19.15.37.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:37:34 -0800 (PST) From: Jiri Olsa X-Google-Original-From: Jiri Olsa Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:37:32 +0100 To: Menglong Dong Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, mattbobrowski@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: support bpf_get_func_arg() for BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP Message-ID: References: <20260119023732.130642-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> <20260119023732.130642-2-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260119023732.130642-2-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:37:31AM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > For now, bpf_get_func_arg() and bpf_get_func_arg_cnt() is not supported by > the BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP, which is not convenient to get the argument of the > tracepoint, especially for the case that the position of the arguments in > a tracepoint can change. > > The target tracepoint BTF type id is specified during loading time, > therefore we can get the function argument count from the function > prototype instead of the stack. > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong > --- > v3: > - remove unnecessary NULL checking for prog->aux->attach_func_proto > > v2: > - for nr_args, skip first 'void *__data' argument in btf_trace_##name > typedef > --- > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > index faa1ecc1fe9d..4f52342573f0 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > @@ -23316,8 +23316,20 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) > /* Implement bpf_get_func_arg inline. */ > if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && > insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg) { > - /* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */ > - insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8); > + if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) { > + int nr_args = btf_type_vlen(prog->aux->attach_func_proto); > + > + /* > + * skip first 'void *__data' argument in btf_trace_##name > + * typedef > + */ > + nr_args--; > + /* Save nr_args to reg0 */ > + insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, nr_args); > + } else { > + /* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */ > + insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8); > + } > insn_buf[1] = BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 6); > insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 3); > insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1); > @@ -23369,8 +23381,20 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) > /* Implement get_func_arg_cnt inline. */ > if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && > insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg_cnt) { > - /* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */ > - insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8); > + if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) { > + int nr_args = btf_type_vlen(prog->aux->attach_func_proto); > + > + /* > + * skip first 'void *__data' argument in btf_trace_##name > + * typedef > + */ > + nr_args--; > + /* Save nr_args to reg0 */ I think we can attach single bpf program to multiple rawtp tracepoints, in which case this would not work properly for such program links on tracepoints with different nr_args, right? jirka > + insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, nr_args); > + } else { > + /* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */ > + insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8); > + } > > new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, 1); > if (!new_prog) > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > index 6e076485bf70..9b1b56851d26 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > @@ -1734,11 +1734,11 @@ tracing_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) > case BPF_FUNC_d_path: > return &bpf_d_path_proto; > case BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg: > - return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_arg_proto : NULL; > + return &bpf_get_func_arg_proto; > case BPF_FUNC_get_func_ret: > return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_ret_proto : NULL; > case BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg_cnt: > - return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_arg_cnt_proto : NULL; > + return &bpf_get_func_arg_cnt_proto; > case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie: > if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && > prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) > -- > 2.52.0 >