From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sohil.mehta@intel.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jon Kohler <jon@nutanix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86/cpu: Add platform ID to CPU matching structure
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:30:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aW89OokcLlnFHlii@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119195057.E6728139@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 11:50:57AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The existing x86_match_cpu() infrastructure can be used to match
> a bunch of attributes of a CPU: vendor, family, model, steppings
> and CPU features.
>
> But, there's one more attribute that's missing and unable to be
> matched against: the platform ID, enumerated on Intel CPUs in
> MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID. It is a little more obscure and is only
> queried during microcode loading. This is because Intel sometimes
> has CPUs with identical family/model/stepping but which need
> different microcode. These CPUs are differentiated with the
> platform ID.
>
> Add a field in 'struct x86_cpu_id' for the platform ID. Similar
> to the stepping field, make the new field a mask of platform IDs.
> Some examples:
>
> 0x01: matches only platform ID 0x0
> 0x02: matches only platform ID 0x1
> 0x03: matches platform IDs 0x0 or 0x1
> 0x80: matches only platform ID 0x7
> 0xff: matches all 8 possible platform IDs
>
> Since the mask is only a byte wide, it nestles in next to another
> u8 and does not even increase the size of 'struct x86_cpu_id'.
>
> Reserve the all 0's value as the wildcard (X86_PLATFORM_ANY). This
> avoids forcing changes changes to existing 'struct x86_cpu_id' users.
> They can just continue to fill the field with 0's and their matching
> will work exactly as before.
>
> Note: If someone is ever looking for space in 'struct x86_cpu_id',
> this new field could probably get stuck over in ->driver_data
> for the one user that there is.
...
> struct x86_cpu_id {
> __u16 feature; /* bit index */
> /* Solely for kernel-internal use: DO NOT EXPORT to userspace! */
> __u16 flags;
> + __u8 platform_mask;
> __u8 type;
> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> };
...
> #define X86_STEPPING_ANY 0
> #define X86_STEP_MIN 0
> #define X86_STEP_MAX 0xf
> +#define X86_PLATFORM_ANY 0x0
> #define X86_FEATURE_ANY 0 /* Same as FPU, you can't test for that */
Wouldn't it be slightly better to locate the new one here to follow the order
in x86_cpu_id above?
> #define X86_CPU_TYPE_ANY 0
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 19:50 [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu: Take Intel platform into account for old microcode checks Dave Hansen
2026-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/cpu: Break Vendor/Family/Model macros into separate header Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 8:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-20 15:03 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 16:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-20 16:34 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 20:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-20 16:48 ` Luck, Tony
2026-01-20 20:50 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2026-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/cpu: Add missing #include Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 0:26 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 8:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-20 15:35 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/microcode: Refactor platform ID enumeration into a helper Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 3:07 ` Chao Gao
2026-01-20 16:06 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 20:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-22 19:26 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/cpu: Add platform ID to CPU info structure Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 3:14 ` Chao Gao
2026-01-20 15:22 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-21 2:03 ` Chao Gao
2026-01-20 8:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-20 15:06 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 20:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-20 20:48 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-19 19:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/cpu: Add platform ID to CPU matching structure Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 8:30 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-01-20 15:09 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/microcode: Add platform mask to Intel microcode "old" list Dave Hansen
2026-01-20 14:33 ` Zhao Liu
2026-01-20 15:10 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-29 21:23 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-01-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu: Take Intel platform into account for old microcode checks Dave Hansen
2026-01-22 13:56 ` Ricardo Neri
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-06 23:14 [PATCH 0/6] [v2] " Dave Hansen
2026-02-06 23:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/cpu: Add platform ID to CPU matching structure Dave Hansen
2026-02-10 23:27 ` Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aW89OokcLlnFHlii@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox