From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cvsmtppost03.nm.naver.com (cvsmtppost03.nm.naver.com [114.111.35.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA043D3015 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 13:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.111.35.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768914602; cv=none; b=CtvflZ3GTAmlDFvdFEKCbzOLNXdDiByvw08QZImNuojWgCiyy5CJWRxSit922hXH311+180S5zA5EKJw3SEMwShZOQARoIFQBHk4dbBdZWmNnHYtcjaRwIWwdAoUj2a+Qr96cb8Ya2Q9/GXSYUdOk5H4kdoMOHwoHtqYvyjOtXM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768914602; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nTteyWzisGF0yABkycFtI7/YPPviBky3/lp0h7ukNU8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=sUIs6c6vrRRRLY4QvTzJvj+Y+zKPvPSKxH8fgcgo0AaGiwYBqGCPYlBGg/Imab3d0eNmi+nB+6EKlaTnClOSbpxDpb3PjH7/+KCYnA8d65igJNtjlIn0dsecG3J/ENzb8xw1anp3q6jkP78Av0npqqtpkXvkGHssN2fUh5MMAk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=naver.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=naver.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=naver.com header.i=@naver.com header.b=Rk0U5m2s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.111.35.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=naver.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=naver.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=naver.com header.i=@naver.com header.b="Rk0U5m2s" Received: from mvsendbo09.nm ([10.179.34.209]) by cvsmtppost03.nm.naver.com with ESMTP id Mxeru6yBR6qoWwdZvbIjUQ for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:59:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=naver.com; s=s20171208; t=1768913990; bh=nTteyWzisGF0yABkycFtI7/YPPviBky3/lp0h7ukNU8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:From:Subject:Feedback-ID: X-Works-Security; b=Rk0U5m2slpX29D4IS4QhA8tUb1w+um9SnhYbdw3Y80dS/6PGpwVgZKZsMO7aw0/LQ e6EpXDRq+bECT2jL27NP1Z+OrJuF6Pwt9Z7j7Cb2pPGSkmwiPfMPqeo4yWGNQTABjp QeC3VrDznvxAYhZOS5usCjk2nVwXFDNfgYghBJLJQZ3NGo3hGbLaPyyXgoNAXbZL32 /5gcQINxWQ7Ux6rR+yxgw09mUUaWyKgWCm7ncG1DMpAmO23Tjy5rU7jsQCZUvYkxmY GRsaRaoyE0rzGxqnMT9hyI25qH5LSES2NFCqGZRSnGcfHiCwLNXIcDBrko968Tfxyv AuLFLGnGWRcOw== X-Session-ID: xpnSNQmbR5+LQa2P4A19xw X-Works-Send-Opt: M/Y/jAIYjHmwKo2qKqJYFquqFNwkx0eFjAJYKg== X-Works-Smtp-Source: zdY/aA2rFqJZ+HmlaAEw+6E= Received: from JMW-Ubuntu ([14.38.141.199]) by cvnsmtp002.nm.naver.com with ESMTP id xpnSNQmbR5+LQa2P4A19xw for (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:59:49 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:59:49 +0900 From: Minu Jin To: dan.carpenter@linaro.org Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com, zxcv2569763104@gmail.com, milospuric856@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix unchecked return value of skb_copy_bits Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Dan, Thanks for the feedback. I agree, following the kernel standard is the right way. I've updated the code to propagate the error codes and fixed the callers. Thanks, Minu Jin