Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 00/17] Support ROHM BD72720 PMIC

Sebastian Reichel
2026-01-14T00:26:51Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1621 bytes --]

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 02:04:47PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 12/01/2026 02:53, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 09:38:31AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > The MFD parts LGTM.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Lee!
> > > >
> > > > > What Acks are you waiting on? What's the merge strategy?
> > > >
> > > > I think everything else has been acked by maintainers, except the
> > > > power-supply parts. I think those have only been looked at by Andreas and
> > > > Linus W. Haven't heard anything from Sebastian :(
> >
> > Yes, I'm lacking behind quite a bit, sorry for that.
> >
> > > > I would love to see the patches 1 - 14 and 17 to be merged (via MFD?). I
> > > > could then re-spin the 15 and 16 to limited audience as I hope Sebastian had
> > > > time to take a look at them. However, I don't think any of the other patches
> > > > in the series depend on the last .
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
>
> Ah. Since the 15/17:
> "[PATCH RESEND v6 15/17] power: supply: bd71828: Support wider register
> addresses" was now acked by Sebastian, then it can also go via MFD?
>
> Also, if it is Ok to address all the "dev_err() + return ERRNO" => "return
> dev_err_probe(,ERRNO,)" conversions in a follow-up, then I guess the whole
> series, including 16/17 is good to go? If this is the case, please just let
> me know and I'll send the follow-up. Otherwise, I will re-spin the 16/17 and
> add a new patch for the remaining "dev_err() + return ERRNO" => "return
> dev_err_probe(,ERRNO,)" case(s)

That's fine with me.

Greetings,

-- Sebastian

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]