From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C529C3806DC for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768294816; cv=none; b=MNiNhjGaSv19mfBN+zaB8pvbRkygmCS7ktVPqUO5t7B4BRVui7YKP8FasWditb45DcfxEkWc6dI/HtPFNDeEBpiTXX4bQm7XTvxJY+IJF4Wcg5MfpvEyIsc9jhtg9dsgsU4nbI9VOXgctzzdzJBgRH0KmMg7RU3ianuVXgKs3gM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768294816; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q50cKRGpSzpksGx2wRSCW/puCMTYc72eke7yvAtDCSA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iUJli5obwP+Xk6X/B0DSQ+Rm9YXLxoF8lPMXgouKZnE+PhRRfshrP6RVxd8R7TcpUjS6QRn9fLal5gLez1UlfgVPpd3ktKCZ48KkZd1UWIFKySIMlI9Lo4L4h91ZUumc6FwzhWDFuXGVuOdJFyjLICyGRXh4kxDPt/ngdprJMFI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=m1ryibWF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="m1ryibWF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768294815; x=1799830815; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=q50cKRGpSzpksGx2wRSCW/puCMTYc72eke7yvAtDCSA=; b=m1ryibWFgKKAnBzQhF6WPvs2aIy74c2yhDyxIsCkmBHCGsD3tY8db1rK PIGLh3YQgnSqD8yM7RmEbt98I/9OjQjKQHsYGeobx87gTW5qOdCHvzOzO OuAtMXO+74glS4ueuxD+QNqsPe2Ja5Wq4Uf5leVNK9tGe+nXvwYpqyYsw r2LSXsz2kyOoJp+nR6GA6etlAvQ02EXa632LPCQBP3lUl0FS6tV+igU2I 3fLtiXZFWvSnpOmDHmJFsuP2sTrXWeUQ3y7LRRzGyn2Ar83/DrqjAxsFp UNr0i35z9wISUuntaQ6p+BqNntyhBtMAXRE+jlfPZ1oKOli+fhr1OlPNQ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s4caTFudRU6XT4WCOgSJog== X-CSE-MsgGUID: c97omRmQRfeR0Nbm1GsJ5g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11669"; a="73206812" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,222,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="73206812" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2026 01:00:15 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8tZF9de7SZ2YRTi6rXncEw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Wpu3IhP5QKiJYN1rwqBqig== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,222,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="209393255" Received: from dhhellew-desk2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.177]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2026 01:00:15 -0800 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:00:11 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pcmcia: Convert to use less arguments in pci_bus_for_each_resource() Message-ID: References: <20231030115053.2752588-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:19:17PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Am Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:17:11PM +0200 schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 01:50:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > The pci_bus_for_each_resource() can hide the iterator loop since > > > it may be not used otherwise. With this, we may drop that iterator > > > variable definition. > > > > Can it be now applied? > > Which tree will this go through? No need to involve the PCMCIA tree, and you > already have my ACK... Still not being applied. Can you pull it via your tree, please? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko