From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
joro@8bytes.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
skolothumtho@nvidia.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
smostafa@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v6 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Mark STE MEV safe when computing the update sequence
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:50:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWe7MaEiGY_uOY4a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f560881df101d76de95c942cdbeab149eae3d581.1768248467.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:20:15PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>
> Nested CD tables set the MEV bit to try to reduce multi-fault spamming on
> the hypervisor. Since MEV is in STE word 1 this causes a breaking update
> sequence that is not required and impacts real workloads.
>
> For the purposes of STE updates the value of MEV doesn't matter, if it is
> set/cleared early or late it just results in a change to the fault reports
> that must be supported by the kernel anyhow. The spec says:
>
> Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced fault
> records even when MEV == 0.
>
> So mark STE MEV safe when computing the update sequence, to avoid creating
> a breaking update.
>
> Fixes: da0c56520e88 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Set MEV bit in nested STE for DoS mitigations")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 390446d259ab..ccd6357fa5a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1086,6 +1086,16 @@ VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
> void arm_smmu_get_ste_update_safe(const __le64 *cur, const __le64 *target,
> __le64 *safe_bits)
> {
> + /*
> + * MEV does not meaningfully impact the operation of the HW, it only
> + * changes how many fault events are generated, thus we can relax it
> + * when computing the ordering. The spec notes the device can act like
> + * MEV=1 anyhow:
> + *
> + * Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced
> + * fault records even when MEV == 0.
> + */
> + safe_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_get_ste_update_safe);
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 20:20 [PATCH rc v6 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix hitless STE update in nesting cases Nicolin Chen
2026-01-12 20:20 ` [PATCH rc v6 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add update_safe bits to fix STE update sequence Nicolin Chen
2026-01-14 15:49 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-01-12 20:20 ` [PATCH rc v6 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Mark STE MEV safe when computing the " Nicolin Chen
2026-01-14 15:50 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-01-12 20:20 ` [PATCH rc v6 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Mark STE EATS " Nicolin Chen
2026-01-14 15:58 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-01-14 16:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-14 16:59 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-01-12 20:20 ` [PATCH rc v6 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage Nicolin Chen
2026-01-14 15:58 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWe7MaEiGY_uOY4a@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox