public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Zhang <starzhangzsd@gmail.com>
Cc: colyli@fnnas.com, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, axboe@kernel.dk,
	sashal@kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangshida@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: fix double bio_endio completion in detached_dev_end_io
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:29:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWilW0RKQiHJzpsZ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANubcdUdQ9gJ7uQELc80h0+FpurR5f2COmB3hBEDejavfFZJ9g@mail.gmail.com>

Can you please test this patch?

commit d14f13516f60424f3cffc6d1837be566e360a8a3
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date:   Tue Jan 13 09:53:34 2026 +0100

    bcache: clone bio in detached_dev_do_request
    
    Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index 82fdea7dea7a..9e7b59121313 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -1078,67 +1078,66 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_nodata)
 }
 
 struct detached_dev_io_private {
-	struct bcache_device	*d;
 	unsigned long		start_time;
-	bio_end_io_t		*bi_end_io;
-	void			*bi_private;
-	struct block_device	*orig_bdev;
+	struct bio		*orig_bio;
+	struct bio		bio;
 };
 
 static void detached_dev_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
-
-	ddip = bio->bi_private;
-	bio->bi_end_io = ddip->bi_end_io;
-	bio->bi_private = ddip->bi_private;
+	struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip =
+		container_of(bio, struct detached_dev_io_private, bio);
+	struct bio *orig_bio = ddip->orig_bio;
 
 	/* Count on the bcache device */
-	bio_end_io_acct_remapped(bio, ddip->start_time, ddip->orig_bdev);
+	bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, ddip->start_time);
 
 	if (bio->bi_status) {
-		struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(ddip->d,
-						     struct cached_dev, disk);
+		struct cached_dev *dc = bio->bi_private;
+
 		/* should count I/O error for backing device here */
 		bch_count_backing_io_errors(dc, bio);
+		orig_bio->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
 	}
 
 	kfree(ddip);
-	bio_endio(bio);
+	bio_endio(orig_bio);
 }
 
-static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
-		struct block_device *orig_bdev, unsigned long start_time)
+static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d,
+		struct bio *orig_bio, unsigned long start_time)
 {
 	struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
 	struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
 
+	if (bio_op(orig_bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
+	    !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev)) {
+		bio_endio(orig_bio);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * no need to call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl),
 	 * because upper layer had already opened bcache device,
 	 * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
 	 */
 	ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
-	if (!ddip) {
-		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
-		bio_endio(bio);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	ddip->d = d;
+	if (!ddip)
+		goto enomem;
+	if (bio_init_clone(dc->bdev, &ddip->bio, orig_bio, GFP_NOIO))
+		goto free_ddip;
 	/* Count on the bcache device */
-	ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
 	ddip->start_time = start_time;
-	ddip->bi_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
-	ddip->bi_private = bio->bi_private;
-	bio->bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
-	bio->bi_private = ddip;
-
-	if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
-	    !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev))
-		detached_dev_end_io(bio);
-	else
-		submit_bio_noacct(bio);
+	ddip->orig_bio = orig_bio;
+	ddip->bio.bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
+	ddip->bio.bi_private = dc;
+	submit_bio_noacct(&ddip->bio);
+	return;
+free_ddip:
+	kfree(ddip);
+enomem:
+	orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+	bio_endio(orig_bio);
 }
 
 static void quit_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c,
@@ -1214,10 +1213,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
 
 	start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
 
-	bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
 	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += dc->sb.data_offset;
 
 	if (cached_dev_get(dc)) {
+		bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
 		s = search_alloc(bio, d, orig_bdev, start_time);
 		trace_bcache_request_start(s->d, bio);
 
@@ -1237,9 +1236,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
 			else
 				cached_dev_read(dc, s);
 		}
-	} else
+	} else {
 		/* I/O request sent to backing device */
-		detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, orig_bdev, start_time);
+		detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, start_time);
+	}
 }
 
 static int cached_dev_ioctl(struct bcache_device *d, blk_mode_t mode,

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-15  7:48 [PATCH] bcache: fix double bio_endio completion in detached_dev_end_io zhangshida
2026-01-15  8:06 ` Stephen Zhang
2026-01-15  8:29   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-18 11:49     ` Coly Li
2026-01-19  6:43       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-19  8:19         ` Coly Li
2026-01-19  8:29           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-19  8:51             ` Coly Li
2026-01-19  6:53       ` Stephen Zhang
2026-01-19  8:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-15  8:59   ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-15  9:17     ` Stephen Zhang
2026-01-15  9:28       ` Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWilW0RKQiHJzpsZ@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=colyli@fnnas.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=starzhangzsd@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox