From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f195.google.com (mail-dy1-f195.google.com [74.125.82.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEEB436C589 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 04:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769054835; cv=none; b=X8nJS4Rm6ddxFEGRJbDDHx7nH8NjIbIlGlqmlZ/kV2mgq99IFVHSc5NC6R5+iWa36i9DusDthGNVir5oNwekgjoUXZQo1j8zyL0hAlJTF7HzOHGk4/FKXw4ibKsYho0Q/njWisbccHoLalvFFzbnh4anIjYTjJPWJNSJL6uZqtY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769054835; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pYKf1JAAXvqM1KiJ39QNevMy+s2lzOXg1IsZoMG4W3s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Nag/oEQ039lT21ch9EQad6a4cBnBCVNBUWbg1xtAOM+TVa1ft/up+UmA2QyhZ9JgqYrZKDWXhmlf0qXb2lvKG1XiQNoGAs3Jx2yhT1Jf3BSTZ0f6bkee5jGJ6bC/4WvIDb4HqZK+IWkzqTyFs+xsGNBZFdwpax/SPakaGE31bQY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=nIJdpQ1H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="nIJdpQ1H" Received: by mail-dy1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b729f4c154so452026eec.0 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 20:07:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1769054833; x=1769659633; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xWpthCYRiRQKWxKiKOdwOg0cgTv3VLuSBcM5vN1ez5c=; b=nIJdpQ1HF5vVCJ/YALlYlinRUiJBT/d+3Ojtex3XwZyGc1S5kV3cZPZs085FKiIa0r JwVWCrn5xu9b+vBrsTrwm0UTdEGtqj5P2xoV4X/PkEjS+/oH1bMGPfqbygJFud+4y2MN ye4jGeSbTRW7U/RcTBdik5jOzL0hTGbcz38HiTVcmCdzYohGnGU9pFV2qRsovMkQsgl0 KCE46IQpEdCe9bzN91tTVFUuj5q5kqbXA0cHMIKgeup33xOSYVcKwIe+qWJEq2ejHBIN jM8V3SGgTA1CdG+pV9ymNc0DcYE00txsmc0hCB4VF/lTiuyo1nTUstdhgN57g8nOGJqY qwjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1769054833; x=1769659633; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xWpthCYRiRQKWxKiKOdwOg0cgTv3VLuSBcM5vN1ez5c=; b=AKN/1LogcP53dWKfSuAXpU0o26kc4QUmloAKVkvMNV+VQVaHLprgkQqaZ1z52j4sHU OYbnePh7mQupStcJzNc0qkzfZqE71bzxXPPFdh/+Wndt8bDDkE/cY6j8LftakUk6us8f QpaMGGNZLzTJvWkT6OSg1upBdsKSKbJXTMjmv+oDvuC11IgmX/hc7UUw0V/xH3DyhvMo eFEYcu2+rWvZvY08dK0QwNK3EqXioOwhYTkTMpl7rmnGC3zbmBC2aRJ/O6P8h2pSVXgo WnF2p1rWEDR/ZH+gnrPGjiesUdfh/E63coClUnsLQEMllVSFQkIHXPzd2xHVHavA5J2P /z4A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWtYQj8iSfxiw9/9A2TE2j36DnBFBl8vgwRc0uUVekihOLZXLXfIoZJ4VywcX5KvfsRiS99NzXv4loytYU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxsrXLrPCXFNt7OXPYU9frLjmJKUcoQADzsLEZzs2zgW4L73GLN MOopsA/FAZUbpTnO9YuHxHirbtP8k4RT6g54Z2oJbWUhCjWvxYs9ABI= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aLJDCPFqGRbJft7FS1kbIJtkZLYnkZn+zMs3DaL7zFkt3VNz+jfgFGKo9lYz2O TVfMgaVgT5DGfSMs4m0eILpYpB9xMHK+OFLiyc8OQ8O5wON3MX4Q5WQxUKV12thXWU2E1BUzovW fB/+Oc7GNmAH21HQ+2xWX1EtQQYpnHe3V8tKuZpCVrhjYHuZ4fEiUKi8sOdUl03Qj86eSDF9P4m TMbRqylpWRMWmc1p4Ztx0iwkqstv4I7CA9FijIq6GsbtSxR1yJY+qkG/nmes2jNEGpzYKv6ZrqA BdDzGHS54v9BuCJZL45fXspHiQvAutaeKHc4rnU4i/PnT0k168Lr8xGg0Wgf759h6rvIXXE37IX BnnRcHYP5Ra6+AVbcCXNDlfiu63au0QjXC7masH8UUGWSXgiVKskqLZfWrsht8iwkADpKYiMF0T 7Bc6s7lRA1xaSpJDbC9RBI6/DFrEELzV4XTuk5OlvT7i6mMUBDBp5jQkn6xP5+L9+rStqr5X00o Noypw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:a583:b0:2b7:1744:725e with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b7174476e8mr1771856eec.0.1769054832652; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 20:07:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-76-102-12-149.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [76.102.12.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2b6b34c0f7fsm24054451eec.3.2026.01.21.20.07.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Jan 2026 20:07:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 20:07:11 -0800 From: Stanislav Fomichev To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Bobby Eshleman , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Willem de Bruijn , Neal Cardwell , David Ahern , Mina Almasry , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Lunn , Shuah Khan , Donald Hunter , Stanislav Fomichev , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 4/5] net: devmem: document NETDEV_A_DMABUF_AUTORELEASE netlink attribute Message-ID: References: <20260115-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v10-0-686d0af71978@meta.com> <20260115-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v10-4-686d0af71978@meta.com> <20260120163650.5a962648@kernel.org> <20260121173512.748e2155@kernel.org> <20260121185021.446b00e8@kernel.org> <20260121194615.33dc0812@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260121194615.33dc0812@kernel.org> On 01/21, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:25:27 -0800 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > > That is correct, neither is true. If the two sockets share a binding the > > > > kernel doesn't care which socket received the token or which one > > > > returned it. No token <> socket association. There is no > > > > queued-but-not-read race either. If any tokens are not returned, as long > > > > as all of the binding references are eventually released and all sockets > > > > that used the binding are closed, then all references will be accounted > > > > for and everything cleaned up. > > > > > > Naming is hard, but I wonder whether the whole feature wouldn't be > > > better referred to as something to do with global token accounting > > > / management? AUTORELEASE makes sense but seems like focusing on one > > > particular side effect. > > > > Good point. The only real use case for autorelease=on is for backwards > > compatibility... so I thought maybe DEVMEM_A_DMABUF_COMPAT_TOKEN > > or DEVMEM_A_DMABUF_COMPAT_DONTNEED would be clearer? > > Hm. Maybe let's return to naming once we have consensus on the uAPI. > > Does everyone think that pushing this via TCP socket opts still makes > sense, even tho in practice the TCP socket is just how we find the > binding? I'm not a fan of the existing cmsg scheme, but we already have userspace using it, so getting more performance out of it seems like an easy win?