From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884833939C7; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769095077; cv=none; b=XemJvYYDzIzlU+bOalsI3QIRXe08y+jTCgyidjZLcU8HpOsT2Eu2HWr0SHZ26VsI/EsZsmc4RPpLbEQzkbJEYXKQcl4johfjnBg87ePzFfn/opoHbBkswL/kTIBBcrzK7Z+FvvblMSSvYyTfPeYIWM9RozsvkLEbJMe/+BgoFlw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769095077; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WPVhFM9E3QUT/BT3ZpMc9zUdkIN3iQBRP629xry+96U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=jXgdAUOPSrUFJAkfFoLk5FQYwwElE+7M0IG6sT8mbRl+4yqJDTXgAySo7N6bgWZZzGObmaDGllBvX58w48+k9yK8SMT5imKIJTZ13d8PKlZQfoq6NTi/5JDw86voQkk55njzJsndhfvIvTUnl8T76yimOfF7i6XbZlvlnBsFzB8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD3B1517; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 07:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from devkitleo.cambridge.arm.com (devkitleo.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.90]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33DD73F632; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 07:17:50 -0800 (PST) From: Leonardo Bras To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Leonardo Bras , Tian Zheng , oliver.upton@linux.dev, catalin.marinas@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net, pbonzini@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuzenghui@huawei.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, yezhenyu2@huawei.com, xiexiangyou@huawei.com, zhengchuan@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64/sysreg: Add HDBSS related register information Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:16:29 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20251121092342.3393318-1-zhengtian10@huawei.com> <20251121092342.3393318-2-zhengtian10@huawei.com> <86wm3iqlz8.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 03:12:28PM +0000, Leonardo Bras wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 12:40:27PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:23:38 +0000, > > Tian Zheng wrote: > > > > > > From: eillon > > > > > > The ARM architecture added the HDBSS feature and descriptions of > > > related registers (HDBSSBR/HDBSSPROD) in the DDI0601(ID121123) version, > > > add them to Linux. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: eillon > > > Signed-off-by: Tian Zheng > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h | 2 ++ > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 1 + > > > arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h > > > index e1deed824464..a6f3cf0b9b86 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h > > > @@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ > > > #define ESR_ELx_CM (UL(1) << ESR_ELx_CM_SHIFT) > > > > > > /* ISS2 field definitions for Data Aborts */ > > > +#define ESR_ELx_HDBSSF_SHIFT (11) > > > +#define ESR_ELx_HDBSSF (UL(1) << ESR_ELx_HDBSSF_SHIFT) > > > #define ESR_ELx_TnD_SHIFT (10) > > > #define ESR_ELx_TnD (UL(1) << ESR_ELx_TnD_SHIFT) > > > #define ESR_ELx_TagAccess_SHIFT (9) > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h > > > index 1da290aeedce..b71122680a03 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h > > > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ > > > TCR_EL2_ORGN0_MASK | TCR_EL2_IRGN0_MASK) > > > > > > /* VTCR_EL2 Registers bits */ > > > +#define VTCR_EL2_HDBSS (1UL << 45) > > > > I think it is time to convert VTCR_EL2 to the sysreg infrastructure > > instead of adding extra bits here. > > > Hi Marc, Tian, > > Marc, IIUC the above was implemented by > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251210173024.561160-1-maz@kernel.org > > Which was recently applied to next, and it its way to mainstream. > > Tian, I think it's worth rebasing this patchset on top of the above. (before applying the changes recommended by Marc) > > BTW, I am working on using the feature enabled by this patchset on a new > optimization, so please include me on any new release. > > Thanks! > Leo