From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C9A1FDA61; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769179915; cv=none; b=WORlC28DeUyh+a6eNdoiE/xvlFqKCdFrHdkVNpk/4cfGEYVGNYVaBswW+RkTGS8VJy8Li/ctJtJB1qTTiUFQD+940QqnPFGqa1AY+cqVJ68Z+7nfgvYEMgWILA/tTcnEPSzH/K1Q5Nak6luTCY36gVxCXNhB0TfuiiSBDbxOXGo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769179915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lHS2xbYz4+qwT/8GeGrirgpdJbqglOBVEwonEBFHUSg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fFKHL9VmaHDf8EuBA4W7oWiAP7JhIsSbcYbycp0CEyG0CqEk+a66TWAmKGdtfk1NIVwtezWJpruxExd4TK9YF68CwhdhMQKE1J6QqmVdSeM5PjjQHh1Y2REtCkz6CCoL5V4Xr2Bpl2RaTeusZ5eUdq4q3ldnYxG0DJvI6u0Odwc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lXzwWq8F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lXzwWq8F" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769179914; x=1800715914; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=lHS2xbYz4+qwT/8GeGrirgpdJbqglOBVEwonEBFHUSg=; b=lXzwWq8FSQD4x8nhP+/czWWgwPM18Da/4xG67lLm+dITDdG8IG+TGTvK yGfNXrZFNDdHUCPKYqk+plhjJSDKJRjkpJjhZBJSsHXxU2AVKClQAGg0+ cbI5OZnmkQguASzYtbo5FeWWhojjtrPlSqFHbhmiZXyqyIJnbg/Vfz/iM gAUk6tVBoQYY43u4LXc31Ij80rg9YiPBi8t2IHA1PWy2LEfCdPrwwftJj lYxLoUH+2blP2l8N20fkbmA6JSjS5Nv//LSeeQ/v6SYq49/NILw8YWJNi g9mQsDT349mO/2+mPeHUANrzQEMgRSNUE3pAABM4u6mWb11BDoqo4eirO Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +7iH2AB1TcudRd1x2AATPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0o9Muj6PRc2U0PBezmVeHw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11680"; a="58005942" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="58005942" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 06:51:53 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gZhVkLopTee/nOb8PPbWmA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0xXUyXQBTb6Eaj0nkc1qaQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="212041936" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.112]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 06:51:50 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:51:47 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/21] iio: magnetometer: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT Message-ID: References: <20260123113708.416727-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20260123113708.416727-21-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260123113708.416727-21-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 12:37:06PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Passing IRQF_ONESHOT ensures that the interrupt source is masked until > the secondary (threaded) handler is done. If only a primary handler is > used then the flag makes no sense because the interrupt can not fire > (again) while its handler is running. > The flag also disallows force-threading of the primary handler and the > irq-core will warn about this. > The force-threading functionality is required on PREEMPT_RT because the > handler is using locks with can sleep on PREEMPT_RT. > > Remove IRQF_ONESHOT from irqflags. ... > Cc: Jonathan Cameron > Cc: David Lechner > Cc: "Nuno Sá" > Cc: Andy Shevchenko > Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Same comment on the location of Cc list. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko