public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] gpiolib: Leverage revocable for other independent lifecycle instances
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 17:52:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXT45B6vLf9R3Pbf@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260116081036.352286-23-tzungbi@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:10:35AM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> There are independent lifecycle instances (e.g., other drivers) can save
> a raw pointer to the struct gpio_device (e.g., via gpio_device_find())
> or struct gpio_desc (e.g., via gpio_to_desc()).  In some operations,
> they have to access the underlying struct gpio_chip.
> 
> Leverage revocable for them so that they don't need to handle the
> synchronization by accessing the SRCU explicitly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>

>  static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
>  {
> -	struct gpio_device *gdev;
>  	struct gpio_chip *gc;
>  	int value;
> +	DEFINE_REVOCABLE(rev, desc->gdev->chip_rp);

DEFINE_REVOCABLE() is racy and can lead to use-after-free since nothing
prevents chip_rp from being revoked and freed while the
revocable_alloc() hidden in DEFINE_REVOCABLE() is running.

>  
> -	/* FIXME Unable to use gpio_chip_guard due to const desc. */
> -	gdev = desc->gdev;
> -
> -	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
> -
> -	gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
> +	REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH(rev, gc);
>  	if (!gc)
>  		return -ENODEV;

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-24 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-16  8:10 [PATCH 00/23] gpiolib: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 01/23] gpiolib: Correct wrong kfree() usage for `kobj->name` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16 13:15   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-16 13:27     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-16 13:30       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-20  4:29     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16 14:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-16 14:38     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-20  4:30       ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-20  9:43         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 02/23] gpiolib: cdev: Fix resource leaks on errors in gpiolib_cdev_register() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-20  8:50   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-20  9:34     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-20  9:39       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 03/23] gpiolib: Fix resource leaks on errors in gpiochip_add_data_with_key() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 04/23] gpiolib: Fix resource leaks on errors in lineinfo_changed_notify() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16 13:26   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-20  3:11     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-20  8:49       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 05/23] gpiolib: cdev: Correct return code on memory allocation failure Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 06/23] gpiolib: Access `gpio_bus_type` in gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 07/23] gpiolib: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 08/23] gpiolib: sysfs: " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 09/23] gpiolib: Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 10/23] gpiolib: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 11/23] selftests: gpio: Add gpio-cdev-uaf tests Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 12/23] gpiolib: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 13/23] gpiolib: cdev: Leverage revocable for gpio_fileops Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 14/23] gpiolib: cdev: Leverage revocable for linehandle_fileops Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 15/23] gpiolib: cdev: Leverage revocable for line_fileops Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 16/23] gpiolib: cdev: Leverage revocable for lineevent_fileops Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 17/23] gpiolib: cdev: Leverage revocable for lineinfo_changed_notify Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 18/23] gpiolib: Leverage revocable for gpiolib_sops Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 19/23] revocable: Support to define revocable consumer handle on stack Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 20/23] revocable: Add Kunit test case for DEFINE_REVOCABLE() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 21/23] selftests: revocable: Add " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 22/23] gpiolib: Leverage revocable for other independent lifecycle instances Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-24 16:52   ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2026-01-26 13:58     ` Johan Hovold
2026-01-27 15:56       ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16  8:10 ` [PATCH 23/23] gpiolib: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-16 10:35 ` [PATCH 00/23] gpiolib: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-16 16:07   ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-01-17 12:48   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-19  8:33     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-21  4:17       ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-01-21 10:42         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 14:21 ` (subset) " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-20  3:13   ` Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXT45B6vLf9R3Pbf@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox