From: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Murad Masimov <m.masimov@mt-integration.ru>,
Quanmin Yan <yanquanmin1@huawei.com>,
Yongzhen Zhang <zhangyongzhen@kylinos.cn>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+55e03490a0175b8dd81d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix slab-out-of-bounds read in fb_pad_unaligned_buffer
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 17:51:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXT4hLBy05W8Spy9@osama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d4b95ff-8a94-4d96-8b75-6153baad9fdf@suse.de>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 08:45:08AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.01.26 um 14:47 schrieb Osama Abdelkader:
> > The function fb_pad_unaligned_buffer() was reading idx+1 bytes per row
> > from the source buffer, but when mod == 0 (font width is a multiple of
> > 8 bits), the source buffer only has idx bytes per row. This caused a
> > slab-out-of-bounds read when accessing src[idx] after the inner loop.
> >
> > Fix this by only reading the extra byte when mod != 0, ensuring we
> > never read beyond the source buffer boundaries.
> >
> > This fixes the KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read reported by syzkaller:
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=55e03490a0175b8dd81d
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+55e03490a0175b8dd81d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=55e03490a0175b8dd81d
> > Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > index eff757ebbed1..a0c4932a6758 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > @@ -113,15 +113,17 @@ void fb_pad_unaligned_buffer(u8 *dst, u32 d_pitch, u8 *src, u32 idx, u32 height,
> > dst[j+1] = tmp;
> > src++;
> > }
> > - tmp = dst[idx];
> > - tmp &= mask;
> > - tmp |= *src >> shift_low;
> > - dst[idx] = tmp;
> > - if (shift_high < mod) {
> > - tmp = *src << shift_high;
> > - dst[idx+1] = tmp;
> > + if (mod) {
>
> How do we end up here if mod equals 0? When I look at the callers of this
> function, cases with (mod == 0) take an entirely different branch. [1] [2]
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18.6/source/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c#L208
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18.6/source/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon_ud.c#L199
>
> > + tmp = dst[idx];
> > + tmp &= mask;
> > + tmp |= *src >> shift_low;
> > + dst[idx] = tmp;
> > + if (shift_high < mod) {
> > + tmp = *src << shift_high;
> > + dst[idx+1] = tmp;
> > + }
> > + src++;
> > }
> > - src++;
> > dst += d_pitch;
> > }
> > }
>
> --
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
> GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>
>
You’re right that callers should only reach this path when mod != 0.
The issue isn’t the mod == 0 case itself, but that the final source byte is read
and consumed even when shift_high >= mod, where no bits are actually used.
I resent a version that only accesses the extra byte when it contributes data.
Best regards,
osama
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-24 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-18 13:47 [PATCH] fbdev: Fix slab-out-of-bounds read in fb_pad_unaligned_buffer Osama Abdelkader
2026-01-19 7:45 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-01-24 16:51 ` Osama Abdelkader [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXT4hLBy05W8Spy9@osama \
--to=osama.abdelkader@gmail.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.masimov@mt-integration.ru \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=syzbot+55e03490a0175b8dd81d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=yanquanmin1@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangyongzhen@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox