From: "Coly Li" <colyli@fnnas.com>
To: <zhangshida2026@163.com>
Cc: <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>, <hch@infradead.org>,
<axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>,
<starzhangzsd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: fix I/O accounting leak in detached_dev_do_request
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:47:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXca3r2-VrdcRBo3@studio.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260126014209.909491-1-zhangshida2026@163.com>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 09:42:09AM +0800, zhangshida2026@163.com wrote:
> From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
>
> When a bcache device is in a detached state, iostat can show 100%
> utilization even after I/O workload completion.
>
> This happens because the caller, cached_dev_submit_bio(), calls
> bio_start_io_acct() to begin accounting. However, if the bio hits an
> early exit path in detached_dev_do_request()—either due to an
> unsupported discard request or a bio_alloc_clone() failure—the
> corresponding bio_end_io_acct() is never called. This leaves the
> in-flight counter permanently incremented, causing the kernel to
> report the device as 100% busy.
>
> Add the missing bio_end_io_acct() calls to these error/early-exit
> paths to ensure proper I/O accounting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Can you mention which patch that this one is fixing? It will help a bit
for downstream maintainers for the backport stuffs.
For this patch, you may add,
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@fnnas.com>
Thanks for the fixup.
Coly Li
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index a02aecac05c..7d855e66a10 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d,
>
> if (bio_op(orig_bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev)) {
> + bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, start_time);
> bio_endio(orig_bio);
> return;
> }
> @@ -1114,6 +1115,7 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d,
> clone_bio = bio_alloc_clone(dc->bdev, orig_bio, GFP_NOIO,
> &d->bio_detached);
> if (!clone_bio) {
> + bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, start_time);
> orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> bio_endio(orig_bio);
> return;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-26 1:42 [PATCH] bcache: fix I/O accounting leak in detached_dev_do_request zhangshida2026
2026-01-26 7:47 ` Coly Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXca3r2-VrdcRBo3@studio.local \
--to=colyli@fnnas.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=starzhangzsd@gmail.com \
--cc=zhangshida2026@163.com \
--cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox