From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
<jpb@kernel.org>, <praan@google.com>, <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate vmid in arm_vsmmu_init
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 19:06:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXgrsJeXB3bpFQqK@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260126211636.GB1134360@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 05:16:36PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:24:24PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > VMID owned by a vSMMU should be allocated in the viommu_init callback, as
> > HW like tegra241-cmdqv needs to setup VINTF with the VMID.
>
> Even the architected SMMU needs this, the VMS (not implemented in
> Linux) should all share the same VMID for the same VM.
But for standard SMMU, the allocation/sharing could happen at the
device attachment to a nested (maybe bypass proxy) domain, right?
vmid is only needed for STE (attach) and invalidation.
Or do you see some other case where vmid must be allocated during
viommu_init?
> > +void arm_vsmmu_destroy(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_vsmmu *vsmmu = container_of(viommu, struct arm_vsmmu, core);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&arm_smmu_asid_lock);
> > + ida_free(&vsmmu->smmu->vmid_map, vsmmu->vmid);
> > + mutex_unlock(&arm_smmu_asid_lock);
>
> Need a comment explaining where the flush is.
Ack.
> It looks like arm_smmu_iotlb_tag_free() does the free in the case of
> INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_VSMMU?
>
> But this patch doesn't have that code yet. So maybe this should be
> merged with the next patch..
Or maybe I should re-order the sequence of the patches. I'll see
what works the best.
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 1:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Share domain across SMMU/vSMMU instances Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Store IOTLB cache tags in struct arm_smmu_attach_state Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 20:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 16:58 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass in IOTLB cache tag to CD and STE Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 20:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:28 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Look for existing iotlb tag in smmu_domain->invs Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 2:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOTLB cache tag if no id to reuse Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-26 22:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 16:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 16:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Flush iotlb in arm_smmu_iotlb_tag_free() Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 2:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate vmid in arm_vsmmu_init Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:06 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-01-27 15:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 17:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 17:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass in vsmmu to arm_smmu_domain_get_iotlb_tag() Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_VSMMU Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove ASID/VMID from arm_smmu_domain Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow sharing domain across SMMUs Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 17:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 17:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXgrsJeXB3bpFQqK@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox