From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix parameter order in nvme_free_sgls() call
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 10:10:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXnScGiFkX7ZFFdE@Mac.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128084958.GB9373@lst.de>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 09:49:58AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 08:59:06PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The call to nvme_free_sgls() in nvme_unmap_data() has the sg_list and sge
> > parameters swapped. This wasn't noticed by the compiler because both share
> > the same type. On a Xen PV hardware domain, and possibly any other
> > architectures that takes that path, this leads to corruption of the NVMe
> > contents.
> >
> > Fixes: f0887e2a52d4 ("nvme-pci: create common sgl unmapping helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > If possible it would be good for this to go in 6.19.0-rc8, as corruption of
> > the root device as part of a kernel update is unexpected. Sadly 6.18
> > already contained this issue, and no-one noticed, so its impact is limited?
>
> This only affects non-IOMMU paths with a non-noop dma_unmap_phys.
> So it is a very common setup, but very severe for those. Because of
Do you mean a "not very common setup"? Otherwise I can't parse the
sentence.
> that we should get into 6.19-rc and -stable ASAP.
>
> The fix looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thanks.
> but maybe we can reword the subject to sound less harmless, e.g.:
>
> nvme-pci: DMA unmap the correct regions in nvme_free_sgls
Fine with me. I think I was more focused on describing the logical
change rather that the actual effect of it. Can you adjust it when
picking up?
Regards, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 19:59 [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix parameter order in nvme_free_sgls() call Roger Pau Monne
2026-01-28 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-28 9:10 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2026-01-28 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-28 14:59 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXnScGiFkX7ZFFdE@Mac.lan \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox