From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6E514E2F2; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769698915; cv=none; b=P0DMYraQSmwiZw0KPpy/jRpD0XiJqDzFOtfo08oaKY7kZmJo/SJAXg3/5iAM+SF3xAFxdZwi88d+2p2eM1hE7JZ4pkqmxcYrLXL7NbZ1ATjUk5NbgIdrC0zRvN2vWxwdRvTnFM62i1cLJRZBEo0MrN9P+/+f/6kwW10iR8lc/rs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769698915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PRJ6WbfIsCqwl3PRDJG2raCmc16x8QC0hsryes2DrSQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DTTjfjps0FcxMi1rurm3TNKvTMsrDPmdTbGOjOabQgUO2XFp6TXYrwT8MBIeujzWR7ZE9HehZCIrZA7B90B/M/aqyRSXNpTkMeNE83TTtRxLNkEzkEQ4lRL+nEEgyDeUNgXO1Q4CA4O4UO+E/T7nEOnp5zP/f3HAMNe9VmhuwfQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hCkgdW77; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hCkgdW77" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5020C4CEF7; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:01:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769698915; bh=PRJ6WbfIsCqwl3PRDJG2raCmc16x8QC0hsryes2DrSQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hCkgdW77AzJl03Q3NZu0CslWlULIihabEZoLCDiFwjgGMGwAh1xz3aH75XT9H0wXe R7pjPPLgXa5v/yLxIzRBYqtJ3CaTuOnjp4q2f3tvVcWjk30AA8BTpXZPAqHIPnY5q/ 5TFYSFTHtYYM+H8a63vZJUt3eWDYu705k6AeuXoHAH7m1VQJO4ndlS0aG5O+21zYq+ uN7KUNITsoFhXINDeE+KglgV/bSP4268Cjb7LV00rQjBNk1g5tYrlUUBoUFBQmH7Wv PwIzvBlLrLowhFLYFwpjp+CxrORi6MW3/7+UlpXuE5+/8Qq4fCo4NxjWFvdAt6NKuN zbgQZjpahz5QQ== Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:01:50 +0000 From: Tzung-Bi Shih To: Johan Hovold Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Laurent Pinchart , Wolfram Sang , Simona Vetter , Dan Williams , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "revocable: Revocable resource management" Message-ID: References: <20260124170535.11756-1-johan@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 03:57:44PM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 06:05:32PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > Turns out there are correctness issues with both the gpiolib conversion and > > the revocable design itself that can lead to use-after-free and hung tasks (see > > [1] and patch 3/3). > [...] > > Revert the revocable implementation until a redesign has been proposed and > > evaluated properly. > > I'll work on addressing the discovered issues and send follow-up fixes. I > believe keeping the current series in linux-next would be beneficial, as it > allows for easier testing and wider evaluation by others, rather than > reverting at this stage. FWIW: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129143733.45618-2-tzungbi@kernel.org/ and https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129143733.45618-4-tzungbi@kernel.org/ are the proposed fixes.