public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Chiachang Wang <chiachangwang@google.com>,
	Yan Yan <evitayan@google.com>,
	devel@linux-ipsec.org, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v5 3/8] xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:28:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXyV028imsUPWSyq@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c30e7f8543048a384f693684ccba5f71fe8543b.1769509131.git.antony.antony@secunet.com>

2026-01-27, 11:42:40 +0100, Antony Antony wrote:
> The current code prevents migrating an SA from UDP encapsulation to
> plain ESP. This is needed when moving from a NATed path to a non-NATed
> one, for example when switching from IPv4+NAT to IPv6.
> 
> Only copy the existing encapsulation during migration if the encap
> attribute is explicitly provided.

Are we sure nobody out there relies on this behavior (silently copying
the existing UDP encap without having to explicitly request it in the
MIGRATE request)? If there are, this patch would break their setup by
clearing the encap that they expect to still be present.

-- 
Sabrina

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-30 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1769509130.git.antony.antony@secunet.com>
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 1/8] xfrm: add missing __rcu annotation to nlsk Antony Antony
2026-02-26 17:07   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-05  7:46     ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 2/8] xfrm: remove redundant assignments Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 3/8] xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP Antony Antony
2026-01-30 11:28   ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2026-02-02 12:57     ` Antony Antony
     [not found]       ` <CADhJOfbkUFaPfxTBrmOnrEh2JvxPKpkxaRrSdJHZGxeoQsQTcw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-02-02 19:38         ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-24  3:28           ` Yan Yan
2026-02-26 15:41             ` Antony Antony
2026-03-06  2:49               ` Yan Yan
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 4/8] xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:43 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 5/8] xfrm: split xfrm_state_migrate into create and install functions Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:43 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 7/8] xfrm: add error messages to state migration Antony Antony
2026-01-30 12:14   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-26 15:43     ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-26 16:59       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-02 14:06         ` Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:44 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 8/8] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration Antony Antony
2026-02-03 21:25   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-26 15:46     ` Antony Antony
2026-02-26 18:05       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-02 14:21         ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-27  1:44   ` Yan Yan
2026-02-27 11:26     ` [devel-ipsec] " Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-27 23:14       ` Yan Yan
2026-03-08 14:42         ` Antony Antony
2026-03-10 11:09           ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-10 16:52             ` Antony Antony
2026-03-14  0:32               ` Yan Yan
2026-03-05  7:51     ` Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:50 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 6/8] xfrm: add state synchronization after migration Antony Antony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXyV028imsUPWSyq@krikkit \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=antony.antony@secunet.com \
    --cc=chiachangwang@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@linux-ipsec.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=evitayan@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox