From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: LeoLiu-oc <LeoLiu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, CobeChen@zhaoxin.com,
TonyWWang@zhaoxin.com, ErosZhang@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dpc: Increase pciehp waiting time for DPC recovery
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:59:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXydEn_lAbNROQKy@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3af9f754-d282-485c-a3f2-49a230bfe143@zhaoxin.com>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 06:07:51PM +0800, LeoLiu-oc wrote:
> Without this patch, PCIE devices may not be usable and could even cause
> more serious errors, such as a kernel panic. For example, the following
> log is encountered in hardware testing:
>
> list_del corruption, ffff8881418b79e8->next is LIST_POISON1
> (dead000000000100)
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:56!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
This should not happen. Which kernel version are you using?
There used to be a use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal.
It was fixed by 11a1f4bc4736, which went into v6.11 and was subsequently
ported all the way back to v5.10-stable.
I suspect you may be using a kernel which lacks that fix.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-30 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 10:40 [PATCH] PCI: dpc: Increase pciehp waiting time for DPC recovery LeoLiu-oc
2026-01-23 20:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-28 10:07 ` LeoLiu-oc
2026-01-28 19:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-02-02 5:55 ` LeoLiu-oc
2026-01-30 11:59 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-02-02 6:00 ` LeoLiu-oc
2026-02-02 9:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-03 11:23 ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-02-04 2:10 ` LeoLiu-oc
2026-02-06 8:13 ` LeoLiu-oc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXydEn_lAbNROQKy@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=ErosZhang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=LeoLiu-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=TonyWWang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox