From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, lance.yang@linux.dev,
mhiramat@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
joel.granados@kernel.org, neelx@suse.com, sean@ashe.io,
mproche@gmail.com, chjohnst@gmail.com, nick.lange@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v7 PATCH 2/2] hung_task: Enable runtime reset of hung_task_detect_count
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 14:26:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYCl9iTmr175xvwN@pathway> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260125135848.3356585-3-atomlin@atomlin.com>
On Sun 2026-01-25 08:58:48, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> Currently, the hung_task_detect_count sysctl provides a cumulative count
> of hung tasks since boot. In long-running, high-availability
> environments, this counter may lose its utility if it cannot be reset
> once an incident has been resolved. Furthermore, the previous
> implementation relied upon implicit ordering, which could not strictly
> guarantee that diagnostic metadata published by one CPU was visible to
> the panic logic on another.
>
> This patch introduces the capability to reset the detection count by
> writing "0" to the hung_task_detect_count sysctl. The proc_handler logic
> has been updated to validate this input and atomically reset the
> counter.
>
> The synchronisation of sysctl_hung_task_detect_count relies upon a
> transactional model to ensure the integrity of the detection counter
> against concurrent resets from userspace. The application of
> atomic_long_read_acquire() and atomic_long_cmpxchg_release() is correct
> and provides the following guarantees:
>
> 1. Prevention of Load-Store Reordering via Acquire Semantics By
> utilising atomic_long_read_acquire() to snapshot the counter
> before initiating the task traversal, we establish a strict
> memory barrier. This prevents the compiler or hardware from
> reordering the initial load to a point later in the scan. Without
> this "acquire" barrier, a delayed load could potentially read a
> "0" value resulting from a userspace reset that occurred
> mid-scan. This would lead to the subsequent cmpxchg succeeding
> erroneously, thereby overwriting the user's reset with stale
> increment data.
>
> 2. Atomicity of the "Commit" Phase via Release Semantics The
> atomic_long_cmpxchg_release() serves as the transaction's commit
> point. The "release" barrier ensures that all diagnostic
> recordings and task-state observations made during the scan are
> globally visible before the counter is incremented.
>
> 3. Race Condition Resolution This pairing effectively detects any
> "out-of-band" reset of the counter. If
> sysctl_hung_task_detect_count is modified via the procfs
> interface during the scan, the final cmpxchg will detect the
> discrepancy between the current value and the "acquire" snapshot.
> Consequently, the update will fail, ensuring that a reset command
> from the administrator is prioritised over a scan that may have
> been invalidated by that very reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
LGTM, feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-25 13:58 [v7 PATCH 0/2] hung_task: Provide runtime reset interface for hung task detector Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-25 13:58 ` [v7 PATCH 1/2] hung_task: Refactor detection logic and atomicise detection count Aaron Tomlin
2026-02-02 6:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-02-02 12:59 ` Petr Mladek
2026-02-03 3:05 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-03 3:08 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-03 9:03 ` Petr Mladek
2026-02-03 11:01 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-04 11:04 ` [PATCH] hung_task: Increment the global counter immediately Petr Mladek
2026-02-04 11:21 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-04 14:00 ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-02-04 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2026-02-06 20:54 ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-02-07 6:10 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-04 14:07 ` [v7 PATCH 1/2] hung_task: Refactor detection logic and atomicise detection count Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-25 13:58 ` [v7 PATCH 2/2] hung_task: Enable runtime reset of hung_task_detect_count Aaron Tomlin
2026-02-02 6:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-02-02 13:26 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-02-01 19:48 ` [v7 PATCH 0/2] hung_task: Provide runtime reset interface for hung task detector Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYCl9iTmr175xvwN@pathway \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=chjohnst@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mproche@gmail.com \
--cc=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=nick.lange@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@ashe.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox