public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	kbusch@kernel.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, terry.bowman@amd.com,
	tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 09:06:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYGsmgyVwvbj83YI@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260124074557.73961-5-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 03:45:56PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> The DPC driver clears AER fatal status for the port that reported the
> error, but not for the downstream device that deteced the error.  The
> current recovery code only clears non-fatal AER status, leaving fatal
> status bits set in the error device.

That's not quite accurate:

The error device has undergone a Hot Reset as a result of the Link Down
event.  To be able to use it again, pci_restore_state() is invoked by
the driver's ->slot_reset() callback.  And pci_restore_state() does
clear fatal status bits.

pci_restore_state()
  pci_aer_clear_status()
    pci_aer_raw_clear_status()

> Use pci_aer_raw_clear_status() to clear both fatal and non-fatal error
> status in the error device, ensuring all AER status bits are properly
> cleared after recovery.

Well, pci_restore_state() already clears all AER status bits so why
is this patch necessary?

> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  	 */
>  	if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) {
>  		pcie_clear_device_status(dev);
> -		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
> +		pci_aer_raw_clear_status(dev);
>  	}

This code path is for the case when pcie_do_recovery() is called
with state=pci_channel_io_normal, i.e. in the nonfatal case.
That's why only the nonfatal bits need to be cleared here.

In the fatal case clearing of the error bits is done by
pci_restore_state().

I understand that this is subtle and should probably be changed
to improve clarity, but this patch doesn't look like a step
in that direction.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-24  7:45 [PATCH v7 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-24  7:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-24  7:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:27     ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 15:02       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-29  5:49         ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-02 14:02   ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-02 21:09     ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-07  7:48       ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27  8:28         ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-27 10:47           ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-27 12:28             ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-06  8:41     ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24  7:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:29     ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:50   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 11:46     ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24  7:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:30     ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 16:58   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-02-03  8:06   ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-02-07  8:34     ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-24  7:45 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] PCI/AER: Only clear error bits in pcie_clear_device_status() Shuai Xue
2026-01-27 10:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-28 12:45     ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03  7:44       ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06  8:12         ` Shuai Xue
2026-01-28 17:01   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-01-29 12:09     ` Shuai Xue
2026-02-03  7:53   ` Lukas Wunner
2026-02-06  7:39     ` Shuai Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aYGsmgyVwvbj83YI@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox