From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@163.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15 v2] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 18:06:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYy3GTXDwZFM3VLy@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5f7cc0e-81c1-49c4-9bfa-61b111c69ae2@linux.ibm.com>
Le Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 07:13:45PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
> Hi Frederic,
> Gave this series a spin on the same system as v1.
>
> On 2/6/26 7:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After the issue reported here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251210083135.3993562-1-jackzxcui1989@163.com/
> >
> > It occurs that the idle cputime accounting is a big mess that
> > accumulates within two concurrent statistics, each having their own
> > shortcomings:
> >
> > * The accounting for online CPUs which is based on the delta between
> > tick_nohz_start_idle() and tick_nohz_stop_idle().
> >
> > Pros:
> > - Works when the tick is off
> >
> > - Has nsecs granularity
> >
> > Cons:
> > - Account idle steal time but doesn't substract it from idle
> > cputime.
> >
> > - Assumes CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING by not accounting IRQs but
> > the IRQ time is simply ignored when
> > CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n
> >
> > - The windows between 1) idle task scheduling and the first call
> > to tick_nohz_start_idle() and 2) idle task between the last
> > tick_nohz_stop_idle() and the rest of the idle time are
> > blindspots wrt. cputime accounting (though mostly insignificant
> > amount)
> >
> > - Relies on private fields outside of kernel stats, with specific
> > accessors.
> >
> > * The accounting for offline CPUs which is based on ticks and the
> > jiffies delta during which the tick was stopped.
> >
> > Pros:
> > - Handles steal time correctly
> >
> > - Handle CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=y and
> > CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n correctly.
> >
> > - Handles the whole idle task
> >
> > - Accounts directly to kernel stats, without midlayer accumulator.
> >
> > Cons:
> > - Doesn't elapse when the tick is off, which doesn't make it
> > suitable for online CPUs.
> >
> > - Has TICK_NSEC granularity (jiffies)
> >
> > - Needs to track the dyntick-idle ticks that were accounted and
> > substract them from the total jiffies time spent while the tick
> > was stopped. This is an ugly workaround.
> >
> > Having two different accounting for a single context is not the only
> > problem: since those accountings are of different natures, it is
> > possible to observe the global idle time going backward after a CPU goes
> > offline, as reported by Xin Zhao.
> >
> > Clean up the situation with introducing a hybrid approach that stays
> > coherent, fixes the backward jumps and works for both online and offline
> > CPUs:
> >
> > * Tick based or native vtime accounting operate before the tick is
> > stopped and resumes once the tick is restarted.
> >
> > * When the idle loop starts, switch to dynticks-idle accounting as is
> > done currently, except that the statistics accumulate directly to the
> > relevant kernel stat fields.
> >
> > * Private dyntick cputime accounting fields are removed.
> >
> > * Works on both online and offline case.
> >
> > * Move most of the relevant code to the common sched/cputime subsystem
> >
> > * Handle CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n correctly such that the
> > dynticks-idle accounting still elapses while on IRQs.
> >
> > * Correctly substract idle steal cputime from idle time
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> >
> > - Fix deadlock involving double seq count lock on idle
> >
> > - Fix build breakage on powerpc
> >
> > - Fix build breakage on s390 (Heiko)
> >
> > - Fix broken sysfs s390 idle time file (Heiko)
> >
> > - Convert most ktime usage here into u64 (Peterz)
> >
> > - Add missing (or too implicit) <linux/sched/clock.h> (Peterz)
> >
> > - Fix whole idle time acccounting breakage due to missing TS_FLAG_ set
> > on idle entry (Shrikanth Hegde)
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> > timers/core-v2
> >
> > HEAD: 21458b98c80a0567d48131240317b7b73ba34c3c
> > Thanks,
> > Frederic
>
> idle and runtime utilization with mpstat while running stress-ng looks
> correct now.
>
> However, when running hackbench I am noticing the below data. hackbench shows
> severe regressions.
>
> base: tip/master at 9c61ebbdb587a3950072700ab74a9310afe3ad73.
> (nit: patch 7 is already part of tip. so skipped applying it)
> +-----------------------------------------------+-------+---------+-----------+
> | Test | base | +series | % Diff |
> +-----------------------------------------------+-------+---------+-----------+
> | HackBench Process 10 groups | 2.23 | 3.05 | -36.77% |
> | HackBench Process 20 groups | 4.17 | 5.82 | -39.57% |
> | HackBench Process 30 groups | 6.04 | 8.49 | -40.56% |
> | HackBench Process 40 groups | 7.90 | 11.10 | -40.51% |
> | HackBench thread 10 | 2.44 | 3.36 | -37.70% |
> | HackBench thread 20 | 4.57 | 6.35 | -38.95% |
> | HackBench Process(Pipe) 10 | 1.76 | 2.29 | -30.11% |
> | HackBench Process(Pipe) 20 | 3.49 | 4.76 | -36.39% |
> | HackBench Process(Pipe) 30 | 5.21 | 7.13 | -36.85% |
> | HackBench Process(Pipe) 40 | 6.89 | 9.31 | -35.12% |
> | HackBench thread(Pipe) 10 | 1.91 | 2.50 | -30.89% |
> | HackBench thread(Pipe) 20 | 3.74 | 5.16 | -37.97% |
> +-----------------------------------------------+-------+---------+-----------+
>
> I have these in .config and I don't have nohz_full or isolated cpus.
>
> CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=y
> # CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC is not set
> # CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE is not set
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y
>
> # CPU/Task time and stats accounting
> #
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN=y
> CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_SCHED_AVG_IRQ=y
>
> I did a git bisect and below is what it says.
>
> git bisect start
> # status: waiting for both good and bad commits
> # bad: [6821315886a3b5267ea31d29dba26fd34647fbbc] sched/cputime: Handle dyntick-idle steal time correctly
> git bisect bad 6821315886a3b5267ea31d29dba26fd34647fbbc
> # status: waiting for good commit(s), bad commit known
> # good: [9c61ebbdb587a3950072700ab74a9310afe3ad73] Merge branch into tip/master: 'x86/sev'
> git bisect good 9c61ebbdb587a3950072700ab74a9310afe3ad73
> # good: [dc8bb3c84d162f7d9aa6becf9f8392474f92655a] tick/sched: Remove nohz disabled special case in cputime fetch
> git bisect good dc8bb3c84d162f7d9aa6becf9f8392474f92655a
> # good: [5070a778a581cd668f5d717f85fb22b078d8c20c] tick/sched: Account tickless idle cputime only when tick is stopped
> git bisect good 5070a778a581cd668f5d717f85fb22b078d8c20c
> # bad: [1e0ccc25a9a74b188b239c4de716fde279adbf8e] sched/cputime: Provide get_cpu_[idle|iowait]_time_us() off-case
> git bisect bad 1e0ccc25a9a74b188b239c4de716fde279adbf8e
> # bad: [ee7c735b76071000d401869fc2883c451ee3fa61] tick/sched: Consolidate idle time fetching APIs
> git bisect bad ee7c735b76071000d401869fc2883c451ee3fa61
> # first bad commit: [ee7c735b76071000d401869fc2883c451ee3fa61] tick/sched:
> Consolidate idle time fetching APIs
I see. Can you try this? (or fetch timers/core-v3 from my tree)
Perhaps that mistake had some impact on cpufreq.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 057fdc00dbc6..08550a6d9469 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static u64 get_cpu_sleep_time_us(int cpu, enum cpu_usage_stat idx,
do_div(res, NSEC_PER_USEC);
if (last_update_time)
- *last_update_time = res;
+ *last_update_time = ktime_to_us(now);
return res;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 14:22 [PATCH 00/15 v2] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched/idle: Handle offlining first in idle loop Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-18 18:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched/cputime: Remove superfluous and error prone kcpustat_field() parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-18 18:25 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched/cputime: Correctly support generic vtime idle time Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/15] powerpc/time: Prepare to stop elapsing in dynticks-idle Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-19 18:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-24 15:41 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 7:46 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 9:45 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 10:34 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 11:14 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 13:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 13:54 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 17:47 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 17:59 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-26 4:06 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-26 7:32 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-26 12:57 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/15] s390/time: " Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/15] tick/sched: Unify idle cputime accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/15] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime granularity test Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/15] tick/sched: Remove nohz disabled special case in cputime fetch Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/15] tick/sched: Move dyntick-idle cputime accounting to cputime code Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/15] tick/sched: Remove unused fields Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/15] tick/sched: Account tickless idle cputime only when tick is stopped Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/15] tick/sched: Consolidate idle time fetching APIs Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 22:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched/cputime: Provide get_cpu_[idle|iowait]_time_us() off-case Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 11:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-20 14:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched/cputime: Handle dyntick-idle steal time correctly Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 11:17 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 00/15 v2] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-11 17:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-02-12 7:02 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-18 18:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYy3GTXDwZFM3VLy@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jackzxcui1989@163.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox