From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BECA227E95 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 18:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770833773; cv=none; b=ZUJKUn7D04iT/2VFsNq94sojoAmW50W4WmeZM7QoESFIFT29BPjOJ98RZuPwnUA3R3DE9fXAwag1ZIWsxlAtkkbXNS+h9lQWMSITrEY6w+bUaM7hpH65dAfpcH41ANSrjFsdrx5wkGRuxFORVcpZyRwi1QX120uo9sFcs6cvzSI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770833773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0pGphvolNdxGw5nPJMfRcOcXTYsqMzmMtWmWhatQ8jk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E4SviLKiAifd7TpcHGWESARYakmlSKMo6qmfMRIoffI4coAO/7c0g/rJ9d5P64QdIFKJ98O+zxTFDfcFhGsTznfHtNCexkvbyU5dFoPiUxXl5ZXXQzDCb7wSxM6JK+Om63OHGhV1KluxBtpPFeBtjiavqGCTuGyw5MHG5ROknCY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=KwUMKRSQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="KwUMKRSQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770833772; x=1802369772; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0pGphvolNdxGw5nPJMfRcOcXTYsqMzmMtWmWhatQ8jk=; b=KwUMKRSQXZMWsxC6oaD+02Scb7s5YCiCxuErFuFFJLOUffmAvqyF0Skc pjfhLztPM+tos49rsRSpoL7fuo+5zBjjinFbPJrIyfFqX0l9/5OjvqHKj vQsUiNQUDgN/9L7549uogZVcTyVAP9fhY8QWV4Yft9bC37h6VwJVUIMpC NO9wfBu3BzJGWPV5NfZpErT7azvJdD7LDXmVP9bzACyGhoWT2cu1wF2ng USbb4FUtjvyWKja7tt7RpCHnVbRoMe0WIt7GFgVwrnO1tZjrdqfiUNUwr SW+RfCXiOpVn0+WLvkrUDZWRASWQH1lQUcMLnAN6nqU7hON91JWHCbr6B A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8J202srKTGW97rx40qteEQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ixz0k65PTVCp534mJkMsBw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11698"; a="82628943" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,285,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="82628943" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2026 10:16:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6IJ78OpVSWOo8354GLzQdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iI0CD0hlRgSciryn5CJ3zg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,285,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211232231" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2026 10:16:11 -0800 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 9972D95; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 19:16:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 19:16:09 +0100 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Dave Hansen , Peter Anvin , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/entry for 7.0-rc1 Message-ID: References: <20260209210924.2330728-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 08:24:49PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 13:09, Dave Hansen wrote: ... > Maybe some people keep their build trees religiously clean or entirely > separate from their source trees. But I certainly don't, and I know > many other developers don't. There may be actual benefits of having source and output not to be mixed. For example, it can be that one has a source on an read-only volume or by a network filesystem. It's possible to say that cloning a Git repository locally is the solution, but for some cases it might be too much. And yes, I happily use `git worktree`. The difference with worktree and output folder, that the output may be located on tmpfs or be removed w/o much thinking of unfinished jobs or so. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko