From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.formilux.org (mta1.formilux.org [51.159.59.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC298C1F for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 03:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771904224; cv=none; b=Nvj5TM9dor5kSrRCTkB5nCXIw7BPAMtQ0AbVSA1d40gUdbIkzlzrQJmwgUkGfQo28d4xUoUI7KbP109dfGMvlrxpXs5XTWSo3qoDDV/vBQ9zXELA8qy2lmxQ5NqR90Ejc028DdezLb05dqr2TLK6AxyL/p96ksZdN76NR1L+1pk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771904224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uxLwwT5O9VSPRkdU6W90tfok3D0biP49TQtc4SdqTLc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lji6zI6IWp6glEh6xrNsRjjV1wkLn0Oj7crjkPaXXJGRKwmHvCE2dyjHjzARopfzq9ytGru7FX4O8kxAY2ageUrWVTxOvEbfdw/3TMjvyXNMhe/XM9qMJqT+rWM9nttCsuNcrb2j4YW+fcGrakVgzfZGhZI6xLd3VawTK3j0GLQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b=mgSxvIhu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b="mgSxvIhu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1wt.eu; s=mail; t=1771903872; bh=BmSmnWLAFmbXSgJp+m4h7EwPH8tdvC0PaTaCNsyfVvs=; h=From:Message-ID:From; b=mgSxvIhubqJF3jbjLgW3lnbVyj+z+if4uzCqKDXuSMWNuMMcOlJGgLGOYTQTiiGbw TExd8kohBBraYLYhVTNlghGBJQoFemLZWFb9MtbV80AJC3xnmss0186DBuupRrFOG4 qYog6vORNqbOFZty5GhkJWXIs66CT9zEAUXCd0Jk= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by mta1.formilux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346D6C0AE2; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 04:31:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 04:31:11 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: rename my_syscallX() to __nolibc_syscallX() Message-ID: References: <20260223-nolibc-namespacing-v1-1-52574ffebb2c@weissschuh.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260223-nolibc-namespacing-v1-1-52574ffebb2c@weissschuh.net> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:40:14PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > The naming convention of the my_syscallX() macros is a bit unfortunate. > They may conflict with application code and the name is very generic. > > Switch to __nolibc_syscallX(). The leading underscores place the symbols > in the implementation-defined namespace, avoiding conflicting names. > It is also clearer that these are non-standard extensions from nolibc. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh Oh thanks Thomas for doing this one! It's indeed one of the last vestigal pieces of the early code before this was a "lib". Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Willy