public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ns: add bpf hooks
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:35:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ2pDzhDFpFMjgb1@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260220-work-bpf-namespace-v1-1-866207db7b83@kernel.org>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 01:38:29AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Add the three namespace lifecycle hooks and make them available to bpf
> lsm program types. This allows bpf to supervise namespace creation. I'm
> in the process of adding various "universal truth" bpf programs to
> systemd that will make use of this. This e.g., allows to lock in a
> program into a given set of namespaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c    | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/nscommon.c       |  9 ++++++++-
>  kernel/nsproxy.c        |  7 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> index 643809cc78c3..5ae438fdf567 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>  #include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
>  #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
>  
> +struct ns_common;
> +struct nsset;
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
>  
>  #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
> @@ -48,6 +51,11 @@ void bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_func_t *bpf_func)
>  
>  int bpf_lsm_get_retval_range(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  			     struct bpf_retval_range *range);
> +
> +int bpf_lsm_namespace_alloc(struct ns_common *ns);
> +void bpf_lsm_namespace_free(struct ns_common *ns);
> +int bpf_lsm_namespace_install(struct nsset *nsset, struct ns_common *ns);
> +
>  int bpf_set_dentry_xattr_locked(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name__str,
>  				const struct bpf_dynptr *value_p, int flags);
>  int bpf_remove_dentry_xattr_locked(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name__str);
> @@ -104,6 +112,19 @@ static inline bool bpf_lsm_has_d_inode_locked(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
>  	return false;
>  }
> +
> +static inline int bpf_lsm_namespace_alloc(struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static inline void bpf_lsm_namespace_free(struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline int bpf_lsm_namespace_install(struct nsset *nsset,
> +					    struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
>  
>  #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_LSM_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> index 0c4a0c8e6f70..f6378db46220 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> @@ -30,10 +30,32 @@ __weak noinline RET bpf_lsm_##NAME(__VA_ARGS__)	\
>  #include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
>  #undef LSM_HOOK
>  
> +__bpf_hook_start();
> +
> +__weak noinline int bpf_lsm_namespace_alloc(struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +__weak noinline void bpf_lsm_namespace_free(struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> +}

I'm wondering how you foresee this hook functioning in a scenario
where the BPF LSM program is attached to this new hook point, although
with its attachment type being set to BPF_LSM_CGROUP instead of
BPF_LSM_MAC? You probably wouldn't want to utilize something like
BPF_LSM_CGROUP for your specific use case, but as things stand
currently I don't believe there's anyhthing preventing you from using
BPF_LSM_CGROUP with a hook like bpf_lsm_namespace_free().

Notably, the BPF_LSM_CGROUP infrastructure is designed to execute BPF
programs based on the cgroup of the currently executing task. There
could be some surprises if the bpf_lsm_namespace_free() hook were to
ever be called from a context (e.g, kworker) other than the one
specified whilst attaching the BPF LSM program with type
BPF_LSM_CGROUP.

> +__weak noinline int bpf_lsm_namespace_install(struct nsset *nsset,
> +					  struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +__bpf_hook_end();
> +
>  #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_##NAME)
>  BTF_SET_START(bpf_lsm_hooks)
>  #include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
>  #undef LSM_HOOK
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_namespace_alloc)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_namespace_free)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_namespace_install)
>  BTF_SET_END(bpf_lsm_hooks)
>  
>  BTF_SET_START(bpf_lsm_disabled_hooks)
> @@ -383,6 +405,8 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_task_prctl)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_task_setscheduler)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_task_to_inode)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_userns_create)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_namespace_alloc)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_namespace_install)
>  BTF_SET_END(sleepable_lsm_hooks)
>  
>  BTF_SET_START(untrusted_lsm_hooks)
> @@ -395,6 +419,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_sk_free_security)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_task_free)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_namespace_free)
>  BTF_SET_END(untrusted_lsm_hooks)
>  
>  bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id)
> diff --git a/kernel/nscommon.c b/kernel/nscommon.c
> index bdc3c86231d3..c3613cab3d41 100644
> --- a/kernel/nscommon.c
> +++ b/kernel/nscommon.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  /* Copyright (c) 2025 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> */
>  
> +#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
>  #include <linux/ns_common.h>
>  #include <linux/nstree.h>
>  #include <linux/proc_ns.h>
> @@ -77,6 +78,7 @@ int __ns_common_init(struct ns_common *ns, u32 ns_type, const struct proc_ns_ope
>  		ret = proc_alloc_inum(&ns->inum);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Tree ref starts at 0. It's incremented when namespace enters
>  	 * active use (installed in nsproxy) and decremented when all
> @@ -86,11 +88,16 @@ int __ns_common_init(struct ns_common *ns, u32 ns_type, const struct proc_ns_ope
>  		atomic_set(&ns->__ns_ref_active, 1);
>  	else
>  		atomic_set(&ns->__ns_ref_active, 0);
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	ret = bpf_lsm_namespace_alloc(ns);
> +	if (ret && !inum)
> +		proc_free_inum(ns->inum);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void __ns_common_free(struct ns_common *ns)
>  {
> +	bpf_lsm_namespace_free(ns);
>  	proc_free_inum(ns->inum);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> index 259c4b4f1eeb..5742f9664dbb 100644
> --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
> +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   *             Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
> @@ -379,6 +380,12 @@ static int prepare_nsset(unsigned flags, struct nsset *nsset)
>  
>  static inline int validate_ns(struct nsset *nsset, struct ns_common *ns)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = bpf_lsm_namespace_install(nsset, ns);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return ns->ops->install(nsset, ns);
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-20  0:38 [PATCH 0/4] bpf: add a few hooks for sandboxing Christian Brauner
2026-02-20  0:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] ns: add bpf hooks Christian Brauner
2026-02-23 10:36   ` Matt Bobrowski
2026-02-23 11:12     ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-24  0:15       ` Matt Bobrowski
2026-02-23 12:44   ` Djalal Harouni
2026-02-27 11:04     ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-24  1:16   ` Matt Bobrowski
2026-02-27 10:33     ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-24  5:10       ` Matt Bobrowski
2026-02-24 13:35   ` Matt Bobrowski [this message]
2026-02-27 14:33     ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-24  5:27       ` Matt Bobrowski
2026-02-24 23:04   ` Song Liu
2026-02-27 10:28     ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-27 16:38       ` Song Liu
2026-03-02  9:46         ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-03 16:44           ` Song Liu
2026-02-20  0:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] cgroup: add bpf hook for attach Christian Brauner
2026-02-20 15:16   ` Tejun Heo
2026-02-21 17:57     ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-23 15:47   ` Michal Koutný
2026-02-27 13:44     ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-09 16:45       ` Michal Koutný
2026-02-20  0:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: add ns hook selftest Christian Brauner
2026-03-05 17:36   ` Alan Maguire
2026-02-20  0:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: add cgroup attach selftests Christian Brauner
2026-03-05 17:43   ` Alan Maguire

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZ2pDzhDFpFMjgb1@google.com \
    --to=mattbobrowski@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox