From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279EB23FC5A for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771946954; cv=none; b=I/W7KTKS85EctqqWE2PHtOo4qWdrE5DF4rntml6uj7pEqm1GqhCnV519Jslcesq6/4kqKOh96p+y925R9q1CHqs4G+bYwwiXnK+a46wxGu03mdYDTfMDoTU0yh7iPZq3uLka1tF0N7tzJEpycZfEEyzcv6QiSNgAL6SC+Pq3hHw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771946954; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GYYXv6VVRwZtol/XwHgKJinofjEGaV8bmC/lIYw3NnI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LOotCQvtMlcstJbMut2ctaA91muUBFiWqEasOm32LKfVDPR4LWBHNiLzan+ne3H21dFAQ6Lxi9QkNY8iOcGQ9hE9EdzxoVvK1HIZLgI2bPmSMm3xUO4nRpRkY+AMa+PCYtIuylD5gC81ZzcD6dwSLGltdlpdD/CR0KXn2FjOpsM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=D8ocsoDH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="D8ocsoDH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1771946953; x=1803482953; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=GYYXv6VVRwZtol/XwHgKJinofjEGaV8bmC/lIYw3NnI=; b=D8ocsoDH3NZIb5+5XG47LbazfRZ4BSJ8dYlOqurWUtZxP92HR05rKYTj UqZlwDKxMjQkzhm6x0VPUjrWKIGItkUN4HquGjDxLM/Hbv9tCP+Yu4VYD yDjgf+j9uc1QKtbNPcpDjq5hOl7NzZDiwnSjtpX5IlBoy4uc7pkvV2750 dUTGZ/CkLi3hAhRLDWs2g94a0A7pcVwoh6GdVELxZdm0KeyXH+vAuvD5s 3BILoRcqiEB7q0yDGP9JkaQhsMMGa7XPWV593jLMZnzhyrRRHdrpUePbV fXmNAeZbY6KAJ0pg2TdOo1mqwt4M5zSGJpoTTcMS1q3P4EetmO3h54bMq w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /uQ0W9aLTOC6EkJY71TkxA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DGK75+pNRfCiwEgVn3KdVw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11711"; a="72839941" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,308,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="72839941" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Feb 2026 07:29:13 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VitnvMP8S3Snzj81R+LENA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6kyoUok2ROW06+MC3MJy3w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,308,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="238930966" Received: from egrumbac-mobl6.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.146]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Feb 2026 07:29:11 -0800 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 17:29:09 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] memory: bt1-l2-ctl: Remove not-going-to-be-supported code for Baikal SoC Message-ID: References: <20260224150616.3585591-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <0eceef2b-4d33-4a09-af92-6b4131a1d8c2@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:24:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 04:18:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 24/02/2026 16:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > As noticed in the discussion [1] the Baikal SoC and platforms > > > are not going to be finalized, hence remove stale code. > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22b92ddf-6321-41b5-8073-f9c7064d3432@infradead.org/ [1] > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > > --- > > > > > > v2: dropped DT bindings change (Krzysztof) > > > > > > > I think we misunderstood each other. I was speaking about that feedback: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260223185754.GA151596-robh@kernel.org/ > > > > so bindings are separate patches. > > > > Was there any other feedback? > > Now you are totally confused me. > I did what you asked, I split bindings removal to a separate patch. The code is > also removed in this patch. What do you want? Bindings removal _separate_ patch: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260224152711.3615622-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko