From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72DF11E32CF for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771251772; cv=none; b=Monbvi6sP/B3+4wK35S2tD7fwalHvybDoO6BCCtugmT4dTC+Oxaq5/6DP2DT8fyBeoPODNkxP7shxNiz09og0/YkqY67bDvslL25hzCEs6jAiAJKzBvWlR45vgBKkMCsU/9C+nRrwvLIeeouFUmrYsL+EtYeeWqt1BLwZpu4LOg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771251772; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zU3ubHaPiCQva4ddg0RMo350B79XWEl6ga718019SJk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F/3gCnx14ymObMyK8BOAALqS265Di3cZMqJaDzYhsJvjchZMg7ibR16qbwMpKpZwGI1H6+HLzuJ0WQ/CYCegFTkHzYsFbv/6dhi9CABRucec2CphAvrf10L/Bd3zR18p+hN04bwPLhPdcO+OoHYEehiro0un6Cs29Waatnq+bf8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Mz+gX6cu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Mz+gX6cu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE394C2BC86; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:22:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771251772; bh=zU3ubHaPiCQva4ddg0RMo350B79XWEl6ga718019SJk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Mz+gX6cu5dvxn4gEY+wL9F1YGHucH/BuL7hxFg9Mcc4yOJj4NuvOMpf+uqsXH3eJv FMpc9oa/eJKGVRcgfmt3M2qEf4fI6+IF0HnusXIFaiKZqdhGEzTAuWkAwjWkgSbBxt KdSSTOZLPsHDBckgsrACyF/nTiYr5OfE6y6/znt1nPklxgvtNG+z1SxoYgYSbn2aWS gPJoclwvzWb4vt7FqHoV7uxDdaDS+6jp4TcURjJNDSclVVNjYCyqqq+GaYKEL+rqC3 0ncL6TRjZAlDsCa1TXg6vqSemz0O+CfXdq3mJeA3JLkbYVHBVj5dVg8b0i8VtC7roK 4VvY+0fdizyYw== Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81C7F4006C; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:22:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:22:50 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvudejuddtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepmfhirhihlhcu ufhhuhhtshgvmhgruhcuoehkrghssehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueeijeeiffekheeffffftdekleefleehhfefhfduheejhedvffeluedvudefgfek necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepkhhirh hilhhlodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdduieduudeivdeiheeh qddvkeeggeegjedvkedqkhgrsheppehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghesshhhuhhtvghmohhvrd hnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvdeipdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphht thhopehrphhptheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvhgvrdhhrghnsh gvnhesihhnthgvlhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrrhgusgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg pdhrtghpthhtohepthhglhigsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhngh hosehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegsphesrghlihgvnhekrdguvgdprhgt phhtthhopegurghvvgdrhhgrnhhsvghnsehlihhnuhigrdhinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtg hpthhtohepthhhohhmrghsrdhlvghnuggrtghkhiesrghmugdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthho peigkeeisehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i10464835:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:22:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:22:49 +0000 From: Kiryl Shutsemau To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Dave Hansen , Ard Biesheuvel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Tom Lendacky , x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moritz Sanft Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Fix reservation of unaccepted memory table Message-ID: References: <20260213154838.46567-1-kas@kernel.org> <20260213154838.46567-2-kas@kernel.org> <6d6dd421-774c-4f29-84d5-3e449240eb93@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 05:51:47PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > My guess that multiple memblock_add() calls might add up to the full > > page size. > > I'm not following here. Can you explain what do you mean? > > Multiple memblock_add() calls to adjacent ranges will coalesce into one > larger range. But I don't see how is that related. I tried to find justification for the byte-level tracking by memblock. Not in relation to this case, but in general. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov