From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C90229C325; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 08:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771316967; cv=none; b=UKxpWh3KV6sP9VHR0VXgfBWO/EOxgrOGNo+HDKwTheF13E/AKGxcuwqxDrYJ0loHOfN7gyBROFSOcY2l0eMd7QMwoJvcyWxPWxikWEv6wv+yJv76z8SbujCy2402eQ513i0eWRJq4smdwCNVPVsEaQmdVTL/j2Cs5cboCZP3Mto= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771316967; c=relaxed/simple; bh=78yiqQD3TsLFYvQIx06un2lkX821g7QwNv6qdcWqBf0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dlJcUD/C2SS7+Jb04KYBDkjoYawbMdIe1ScqX/et8WNzSFi8mVMEqZ89YiIrwEmB/HKv3tcJ/SK8y8OTyqKjN+xVlkCyYOMjBWldx9kChkDl6hfnBsIubOp+k/sTtwFxkgAsggjNOjjXY6BV4XgPGx7SrnwSS3Dbvv2KzcPdj00= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=d0HP/DfR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="d0HP/DfR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1771316966; x=1802852966; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=78yiqQD3TsLFYvQIx06un2lkX821g7QwNv6qdcWqBf0=; b=d0HP/DfRGf2VUTBTz74bJ0FRfBtq6GDhHbNpOlYYvZvsL0qQugUY41PZ hRjcbfQn8tAzjf6bxUqQ2N090V6pq6uTj2zda/fiuNLeP0jZ+FA+DQgBC o8QHA+XacnpvYSX+3kCsKoUdwzSQs5cu+tbhP6Z5x3UqG1X+L+qsU/BFV otSY1uaN3E+0k3/fqlArFYnbWr+NlLr1TKDNbVE2ky9T2jskqXgW1Y8Z6 yh88zr+mBtkFQWyidn4omuUdYSLudzrhTjp0GxDH9fXAydB8GiEfHX8pU ibvbJsXLXQsTbGPkwgeam4vNBP2k99AyhYYBpyL5hDxSmbbo2e4cbeyag A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rfd+LAWERCSQ1mmXg2v44Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WAkhZSaKS4iL8DzDX2NHKA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11703"; a="74983151" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,295,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="74983151" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2026 00:29:26 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yyEBDAqLTzu8tMgm176fhA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WWefMD71Se6KpNeu7qKVYQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,295,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="212047717" Received: from lstrano-mobl6.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.124.220.245]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2026 00:29:23 -0800 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:29:21 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Archit Anant Cc: jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: use div64_ul() instead of do_div() Message-ID: References: <20260122145633.14938-1-architanant5@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 09:22:32PM +0530, Archit Anant wrote: > Gentle ping on this. > > Has anyone from AD had a chance to confirm whether the original > truncation via (mclk / 4) was intentional? > > If there are no objections, I can prepare a v2 using the BIT_ULL(29) > form as suggested. Gentle ping on reading and understanding the given comments, please! > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 10:27:52PM +0530, Archit Anant wrote: > > > (Resending to the list, apologies for the private reply earlier.) > > > > First of all, do no top post! ^^^ Have you understood this? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko