public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] HID: Fix some memory leaks in drivers/hid
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 21:08:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZTK2ZLjmoUMy9of@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZS0OAaSPhX2pJ6l@plouf>

Hello!

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 07:36:46PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Feb 17 2026, Günther Noack wrote:
> > These patches fix a few memory leaks in HID report descriptor fixups.
> > 
> > FWIW, a good ad-hoc way to look for usages of allocation functions in
> > these is:
> > 
> >   awk '/static.*report_fixup.*/,/^}/ { print FILENAME, $0 }' drivers/hid/hid-*.c \
> >     | grep -E '(malloc|kzalloc|kcalloc|kmemdup)'
> > 
> > The devm_* variants are safe in this context, because they tie the
> > allocated memory to the lifetime of the driver.
> 
> No. Look at hid_close_report() in drivers/hid/hid-core.c.
> 
> HID still hasn't fully migrated to devm, so as a rule of thumb, if you
> change a kzalloc into a devm_kzalloc, you are getting into troubles
> unless you fix the all the kfree path.

OK, I have not verified where the devm-allocated objects get freed up.
If devm_*() is not possible here, then the drivers hid-asus.c and
hid-gembird.c have two additional memory leaks, because they do that.

$ awk '/static.*report_fixup.*/,/^}/ { print FILENAME, $0 }' drivers/hid/hid-*.c | grep -E 'alloc'
drivers/hid/hid-asus.c          new_rdesc = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, new_size, GFP_KERNEL);
drivers/hid/hid-gembird.c               new_rdesc = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, new_size, GFP_KERNEL);

(That is without my threee patches)


> > For transparency, I generated these commits with Gemini-CLI,
> > starting with this prompt:
> > 
> >     We are working in the Linux kernel. In the HID drivers in
> >     `drivers/hid/hid-*.c`, the `report_fixup` driver hook is a function
> >     that gets a byte buffer (with size) as input and that may modify that
> >     byte buffer, and optionally return a pointer to a new byte buffer and
> >     update the size.  The returned value is *not* memory-managed by the
> >     caller though and will not be freed subsequently.  When the
> 
> If the memory is *not* managed, why would gemini converts kzalloc into
> devm variants without changing the kfree paths????

I'm not sure I understand the question, it's not clear to me what you
mean by the "kfree paths".

I have seen usages of devm in other HID drivers and I was under the
impression that devm_* allocations would work in the HID subsystem to
allocate objects which are then freed automatically at a later point
when the device gets removed.  Is that inaccurate?


> >     `report_fixup` implementation allocates a new buffer and returns that,
> >     that will not get freed by the caller.  
> 
> This is wrong. See hid_close_report(): if the new rdesc (after fixup)
> differs from the one initially set, there is an explicit call to
> kfree().
> 
> -> there is no memleak AFAICT, and your prompt is wrong.

See my discussion in [1].  The pointer returned by report_fixup() is
immediately discarded in the position marked with (4).  This is still
in the hid_open_report() function where the leak happens.

Let me know whether this makes sense.  I'm happy to be corrected, but
so far, I still have the feeling that my reasoning is sound.

—Günther

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aZTEnPEHcWEkoTJR@google.com/

      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-17 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-17 16:01 [PATCH 0/3] HID: Fix some memory leaks in drivers/hid Günther Noack
2026-02-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] HID: apple: avoid memory leak in apple_report_fixup() Günther Noack
2026-02-17 18:22   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-17 19:42     ` Günther Noack
2026-02-18 19:04       ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-19 15:47         ` Günther Noack
2026-02-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] HID: magicmouse: avoid memory leak in magicmouse_report_fixup() Günther Noack
2026-02-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] HID: asus: avoid memory leak in asus_report_fixup() Günther Noack
2026-02-17 18:31   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-17 19:51     ` Günther Noack
2026-02-17 18:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] HID: Fix some memory leaks in drivers/hid Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-17 20:08   ` Günther Noack [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZTK2ZLjmoUMy9of@google.com \
    --to=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox