From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: stream: Remove unnecessary gotos
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:13:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa039ad4-ebb8-0ce6-80f9-480b7a0bf5ac@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602101140.2040141-5-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
On 6/2/23 05:11, Charles Keepax wrote:
> There is a lot of code using gotos to skip small sections of code, this
> is a fairly dubious use of a goto, especially when the level of
> intentation is really low. Most of this code doesn't even breach 80
> characters when naively shifted over.
>
> Simplify the code a bit, by replacing these unnecessary gotos with
> simple ifs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Split out the inversion of the alloc_*_rt logic
>
> Worth noting this patch has no functional corrections it is just a
> stylistic change, so as Pierre said on v1 we could just leave things
> as is. Personally, I would prefer to merge it though, whilst the diff
> is a little more of a pain to review (hopefully eased somewhat by
> splitting out the alloc_*_rt logic into a separate patch), the
> resulting code reads much nicer and the code will be read a lot more
> times than this patch will be.
Indeed, the resulting code is much nicer to look at. I ignored the diffs
and just looked at the result to make up my mind.
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> index df5600a80c174..93baca08a0dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> @@ -1355,25 +1355,23 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (!update_params)
> - goto program_params;
> -
> - /* Increment cumulative bus bandwidth */
> - /* TODO: Update this during Device-Device support */
> - bus->params.bandwidth += m_rt->stream->params.rate *
> - m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps;
> -
> - /* Compute params */
> - if (bus->compute_params) {
> - ret = bus->compute_params(bus);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(bus->dev, "Compute params failed: %d\n",
> - ret);
> - goto restore_params;
> + if (update_params) {
> + /* Increment cumulative bus bandwidth */
> + /* TODO: Update this during Device-Device support */
> + bus->params.bandwidth += m_rt->stream->params.rate *
> + m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps;
> +
> + /* Compute params */
> + if (bus->compute_params) {
> + ret = bus->compute_params(bus);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(bus->dev, "Compute params failed: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + goto restore_params;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> -program_params:
> /* Program params */
> ret = sdw_program_params(bus, true);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -1876,30 +1874,25 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> * it first), if so skip allocation and go to configuration
> */
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(bus, stream);
> - if (m_rt)
> - goto skip_alloc_master_rt;
> -
> - m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream);
> if (!m_rt) {
> - dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",
> - __func__, stream->name);
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> -
> - alloc_master_rt = true;
> -skip_alloc_master_rt:
> -
> - if (sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt))
> - goto skip_alloc_master_port;
> + m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream);
> + if (!m_rt) {
> + dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",
> + __func__, stream->name);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
>
> - ret = sdw_master_port_alloc(m_rt, num_ports);
> - if (ret)
> - goto alloc_error;
> + alloc_master_rt = true;
> + }
>
> - stream->m_rt_count++;
> + if (!sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt)) {
> + ret = sdw_master_port_alloc(m_rt, num_ports);
> + if (ret)
> + goto alloc_error;
>
> -skip_alloc_master_port:
> + stream->m_rt_count++;
> + }
>
> ret = sdw_master_rt_config(m_rt, stream_config);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1992,46 +1985,41 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> * and go to configuration
> */
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(slave->bus, stream);
> - if (m_rt)
> - goto skip_alloc_master_rt;
> -
> - /*
> - * If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid.
> - * So, allocate m_rt and add Slave to it.
> - */
> - m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(slave->bus, stream);
> if (!m_rt) {
> - dev_err(&slave->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",
> - __func__, stream->name);
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> + /*
> + * If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid.
> + * So, allocate m_rt and add Slave to it.
> + */
> + m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(slave->bus, stream);
> + if (!m_rt) {
> + dev_err(&slave->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",
> + __func__, stream->name);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
>
> - alloc_master_rt = true;
> + alloc_master_rt = true;
> + }
>
> -skip_alloc_master_rt:
> s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream);
> - if (s_rt)
> - goto skip_alloc_slave_rt;
> -
> - s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt);
> if (!s_rt) {
> - dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", stream->name);
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto alloc_error;
> - }
> -
> - alloc_slave_rt = true;
> + s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt);
> + if (!s_rt) {
> + dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",
> + stream->name);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto alloc_error;
> + }
>
> -skip_alloc_slave_rt:
> - if (sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt))
> - goto skip_port_alloc;
> + alloc_slave_rt = true;
> + }
>
> - ret = sdw_slave_port_alloc(slave, s_rt, num_ports);
> - if (ret)
> - goto alloc_error;
> + if (!sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt)) {
> + ret = sdw_slave_port_alloc(slave, s_rt, num_ports);
> + if (ret)
> + goto alloc_error;
> + }
>
> -skip_port_alloc:
> ret = sdw_master_rt_config(m_rt, stream_config);
> if (ret)
> goto unlock;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 10:11 [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: stream: Add missing clear of alloc_slave_rt Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] soundwire: bandwidth allocation: Remove pointless variable Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: stream: Remove unneeded checks for NULL bus Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 14:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] soundwire: stream: Invert logic on runtime alloc flags Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 15:01 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: stream: Remove unnecessary gotos Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 15:13 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-06-08 11:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: stream: Add missing clear of alloc_slave_rt Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa039ad4-ebb8-0ce6-80f9-480b7a0bf5ac@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox