From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.formilux.org (mta1.formilux.org [51.159.59.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A05ED27E for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2026 09:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772961808; cv=none; b=G9LVQs7gJEV8BOxkTamP06lKprBp2rnxfVzvGLWy6+XMJUV4mevtQdr4cv98pRSOOC8D3mPZT7ze+jwxqMTYaQfcA+BiOW+AsUErjBFTs3D5OBsGvTxQQZABJi7zitClRp5fH1aW7Ciuq94Aq8b/1cMOydp4eDTSeK0NwJ3//iQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772961808; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dNYwCdXMFiLRj4huIQVVQm+2HLxloAoxJLDxuATwIn0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LQNMZBIDwkNB0SDmjeWgIsUJx/ywSB1BW41NBxkkzoFPw4WckdNzDf8EDVwJlAQ1VypI2axBqX7FYN6tMLkLaUy2+ejssEVcK7rwB8z1l2VX319g56BV3nsnFx/SWQBg7j23LTsOWjZF3tKtobKUjONsKIEu8LM0f5/LRuXCqNM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b=s9dWgton; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b="s9dWgton" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1wt.eu; s=mail; t=1772961804; bh=yNYrxNeeedkDIVHQqax1nZmhzx8kcITOR3799cOXjbs=; h=From:Message-ID:From; b=s9dWgton6ZYrJfnVp6ZJyF6dyAavk75SHzci4OfSJyaCLdjPUDjDZQls9FKcavT1Q YnSRAM6w0x0K2GN9c66uQUn+b4S/J7qtKcR1cVMGNBTb4xCATARIR80OfjqEask8RT eKj1d8rxPuuWgbWB60KhIVZwYSTCoxb/essfq370= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by mta1.formilux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4454C0A03; Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:23:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2026 10:23:24 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: david.laight.linux@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cheng Li Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 next 00/23] Enhance printf() Message-ID: References: <20260302101815.3043-1-david.laight.linux@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 07:02:30PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi David, > > On 2026-03-02 10:17:52+0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote: > > From: David Laight > > (...) > > I am happy with the patches of this series. > > > David Laight (23): > > tools/nolibc: Add _NOLIBC_OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() to compiler.h > > > tools/nolibc/printf: Move snprintf length check to callback > > selftests/nolibc: Return correct value when printf test fails > > selftests/nolibc: check vsnprintf() output buffer before the length > > selftests/nolibc: Use length of 'expected' string to check snprintf() output > > selftests/nolibc: Check that snprintf() doesn't write beyond the buffer end > > selftests/nolibc: Let EXPECT_VFPRINTF() tests be skipped > > > selftests/nolibc: Rename w to written in expect_vfprintf() > > Unfortunately b4 chokes on these patches because this patch is missing > the 'v4' tag in the subject prefix. Given that the one below needs some > changes anyways, I was lazy and applied the series only up until here. > (Patch 1 is also not applied, as there was no user yet for > _NOLIBC_OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() ). > > Could you rebase the series on nolibc-next, add the error handling > to strerror_r(), fix the wording nitpicks from Willy and resend the > patches? I can also try to fix this up locally, but that would be more > work on my side than it would be for you I reckon. > Let me know if this is an issue and I'll try to make it work. > > Willy: > > I interpreted your mail [0] as Acked-by for the whole series. > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aawDlqLdpgsfGI4r@1wt.eu/ Yep definitely! Willy