From: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/14] x86/irq: Make irqstats array based
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:12:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa8NjoGSgF8Eq_iy@shell.ilvokhin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260303154548.218256740@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 07:55:45PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Having the x86 specific interrupt statistics as a data structure with
> individual members instead of an array is just stupid as it requires
> endless copy and paste in arch_show_interrupts() and arch_irq_stat_cpu(),
> where the latter does not even take the latest interrupt additions into
> account. The resulting #ifdef orgy is just disgusting.
>
> Convert it to an array of counters, which does not make a difference in the
> actual interrupt hotpath increment as the array index is constant and
> therefore not any different than the member based access.
>
> But in arch_show_interrupts() and arch_irq_stat_cpu() this just turns into
> a loop, which reduces the text size by ~2k (~12%):
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 19643 15250 904 35797 8bd5 ../build/arch/x86/kernel/irq.o
> 17355 15250 904 33509 82e5 ../build/arch/x86/kernel/irq.o
>
> Adding a new vector or software counter only requires to update the table
> and everything just works. Using the core provided emit function which
> speeds up 0 outputs makes it significantly faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | 2
> arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c | 2
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 2
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2
> arch/x86/events/intel/knc.c | 2
> arch/x86/events/intel/p4.c | 2
> arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.c | 2
> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 2
> arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h | 69 ++++++----
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 3
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 4
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/acrn.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 8 -
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/threshold.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 4
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 227 ++++++++++--------------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/irq_work.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 4
> arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 6
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 2
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 2
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 2
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 6
> arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 2
> 27 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 232 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> - if (x86_platform_ipi_callback) {
> - seq_printf(p, "%*s:", prec, "PLT");
> - for_each_online_cpu(j)
> - put_decimal(p, irq_stats(j)->x86_platform_ipis);
> - seq_puts(p, " Platform interrupts\n");
> - }
> + ISS(APIC_TIMER, "LOC", " Local timer interrupts\n"),
> + ISS(SPURIOUS, "SPU", " Spurious interrupts\n"),
> + ISS(APIC_PERF, "PMI", " Performance monitoring interrupts\n"),
> + ISS(IRQ_WORK, "IWI", " IRQ work interrupts\n"),
> + ISS(ICR_READ_RETRY, "RTR", " APIC ICR read retries\n"),
> + ISS(X86_PLATFORM_IPI, "PLT", " Platform interrupts\n"),
The old code only showed "PLT" when x86_platform_ipi_callback was set,
but with ISS() this is now unconditional.
Is this intentional?
[...]
> - seq_printf(p, "%*s: %10u\n", prec, "ERR", atomic_read(&irq_err_count));
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
> - seq_printf(p, "%*s: %10u\n", prec, "MIS", atomic_read(&irq_mis_count));
> + ITS(HYPERV_REENLIGHTMENT, "HRE", " Hyper-V reenlightment interrupts\n"),
HYPERV_REENLIGHTMENT doesn't match the enum (HYPERV_REENLIGHTENMENT).
This should break the build with CONFIG_HYPERV=y. There is also a same
typo in text description.
> + seq_printf(p, "ERR: %10u\n", (unsigned int) atomic_read(&irq_err_count));
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC))
> + seq_printf(p, "MIS: %10u\n", (unsigned int) atomic_read(&irq_mis_count));
This drops the prec-based alignment for ERR and MIS.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 18:55 [patch 00/14] genirq: Improve /proc/interrupts for real and add a binary interface Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 01/14] x86/irq: Optimize interrupts decimals printing Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 02/14] genirq/proc: Avoid formatting zero counts in /proc/interrupts Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-09 15:59 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 03/14] genirq/proc: Utilize irq_desc::tot_count to avoid evaluation Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-09 16:04 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 04/14] x86/irq: Make irqstats array based Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 22:18 ` Michael Kelley
2026-03-05 15:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-09 18:12 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin [this message]
2026-03-10 10:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 05/14] genirq: Expose nr_irqs in core code Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-09 18:26 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 06/14] genirq: Cache the condition for /proc/interrupts exposure Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:46 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 18:55 ` [patch 07/14] genirq: Calculate precision only when required Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:57 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 08/14] genirq: Add rcuref count to struct irq_desc Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 09/14] genirq: Expose irq_find_desc_at_or_after() in core code Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 10/14] genirq/proc: Speed up /proc/interrupts iteration Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 11/14] [RFC] genirq: Cache target CPU for single CPU affinities Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 12/14] [RFC] genirq/proc: Provide binary statistic interface Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 13/14] [RFC] genirq/proc: Provide architecture specific binary statistics Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-04 18:56 ` [patch 14/14] [RFC] x86/irq: Hook up architecture specific stats Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa8NjoGSgF8Eq_iy@shell.ilvokhin.com \
--to=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox