From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, xin@zytor.com, nikunj.dadhania@amd.com,
santosh.shukla@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: SVM: Initialize FRED VMCB fields
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:57:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa8YH4yzXAXGiL4k@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c5d0db9-5151-4edb-9b97-0f0b268cf36e@amd.com>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026, Shivansh Dhiman wrote:
> Hey Sean,
>
> On 07-03-2026 07:28, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026, Shivansh Dhiman wrote:
> >> From: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
> >>
> >> The upcoming AMD FRED (Flexible Return and Event Delivery) feature
> >> introduces several new fields to the VMCB save area. These fields include
> >> FRED-specific stack pointers (fred_rsp[0-3], fred_ssp[1-3]), stack level
> >> tracking (fred_stklvls), and configuration (fred_config).
> >>
> >> Ensure that a vCPU starts with a clean and valid FRED state on
> >> capable hardware. Also update the size of save areas of VMCB.
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> >> index f4ccb3e66635..5cec971a1f5a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> >> @@ -1110,6 +1110,16 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> >> save->idtr.base = 0;
> >> save->idtr.limit = 0xffff;
> >>
> >> + save->fred_rsp0 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_rsp1 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_rsp2 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_rsp3 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_stklvls = 0;
> >> + save->fred_ssp1 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_ssp2 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_ssp3 = 0;
> >> + save->fred_config = 0;
> >
> > Is this architecturally correct? I.e. are all the FRED MSRs zeroed on INIT?
>
> Yes that's right, the FRED MSRs are zeroed on init.
Please use that as the basis for the changelog. "Ensure that a vCPU starts with
a clean and valid FRED state on capable hardware" is largely meaningless because
vCPU structures are zero-allocated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 6:36 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: SVM: Enable FRED support Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: SVM: Initialize FRED VMCB fields Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-07 1:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-09 17:46 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-09 18:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-03-11 4:18 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-27 6:41 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: SVM: Disable interception of FRED MSRs for FRED supported guests Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-07 2:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-09 17:47 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: SVM: Save restore FRED_RSP0 " Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-05 20:37 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: SVM: Populate FRED event data on event injection Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-06 11:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-03-09 19:47 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: SVM: Support FRED nested exception injection Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-07 2:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-10 15:56 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-10 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-11 4:12 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: SVM: Dump FRED context in dump_vmcb() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-07 2:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-09 19:57 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-01-29 6:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: SVM: Enable save/restore of FRED MSRs Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-07 2:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-09 18:20 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-02-06 9:22 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: SVM: Enable FRED support Shivansh Dhiman
2026-02-11 0:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-06 9:33 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-03 17:58 ` Shivansh Dhiman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-14 12:55 Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: SVM: Initialize FRED VMCB fields Christian Ludloff
2026-03-27 6:47 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-03-27 7:29 ` Christian Ludloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa8YH4yzXAXGiL4k@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj.dadhania@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=shivansh.dhiman@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox