From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716FA34F241 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 21:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.67.36.65 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773092897; cv=none; b=JIYKd/+nRisQzB7gwQi7yrSQ+XG69SZhJUPuuQw6VmHftmsJUE5xS2Vha1aoropF+ZnzMIgyvuVOe0Kk39GZrkvEGwn+7yrkRLa43Bs/mUbNUjTeoTswg2WrC8SiSgVR66rUoG0BrVuBflc6ay6A5u5mds2JNeOgeCx/dnbhV6A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773092897; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z/bBxdgg4opJH+WEukzkydne8BK48a/y2MHhP40fG7Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oOs2AXDYiMDDSGA63lYQni/dYZ/1PRekv92iQc/iB5O2fISv497+KKk+bWaF/01RFm0nVxUESM7VCmGqItW+I4fWVQqYs5XBe84kJB2C59QtOgp08stbJS1np2AAbXLhtdJfWGjLO7z7be9h/YUPdHuU9sPIfcMVDAY6VBBxHPc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=posteo.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=posteo.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de header.i=@posteo.de header.b=JER//Vo2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.67.36.65 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=posteo.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=posteo.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de header.i=@posteo.de header.b="JER//Vo2" Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84616240027 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:48:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1773092893; bh=mtLdpYSnewA1ZtSxotqVlsMvB8VbpYPD7lzl0A/KmV0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:From; b=JER//Vo2ALlpu206cwsevOrDb7Ihn1/ws54UaFbGVlEvYCy9RdgNYAqWBnO6BNoD4 r6L749ozFTgEIHLU0yrunUfCyLJhh6AOD1yZlF0s1UVCQQKCPvGy8CtMWmQUNuHBC2 LasD+QubOleGp/qjRUzwTMTYZeT9yX6FSENWedxnAWu8GpHClOhItr+NNAB7ogrcbz g41GXW4k+M+6+OSIE07eVDyx9lq3spcjzw0562XOscTxZ0GGygPI6UD9db9FQo9+C0 JqZo6uPV1nHzuUb4m94WEyCFgOM25T1jnIFJygHOtFCdZFA/GJN7DMYf9CMorcs2GA Iullz/BOogQVA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4fV9cC66RBz9rxL; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:48:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 21:48:12 +0000 From: Paul Adam To: Stephan Gerhold Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916-wiko-chuppito: add initial devicetree Message-ID: References: <20260307-wiko-chuppito-v4-0-325ac66ae338@posteo.de> <20260307-wiko-chuppito-v4-3-325ac66ae338@posteo.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 26/03/09 10:16, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-wiko-chuppito.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-wiko-chuppito.dts > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..d927bae2b208 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-wiko-chuppito.dts > > @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ > > [...] > > +&sound { > > + audio-routing = "AMIC1", "MIC BIAS Internal1", > > + "AMIC2", "MIC BIAS Internal2", > > + "AMIC3", "MIC BIAS Internal1"; > > Sorry, just noticed this now: > > This seems a bit suspicious (I would expect "MIC BIAS Internal3"), have > you tested if the secondary microphone works? > > Thanks, > Stephan The secondary microphone does not work yet, neither with Internal1 nor Internal3. In the downstream devicetree its Internal1 for AMIC3. Is there a way for me to check which one is correct? Paul