From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ilvokhin.com (mail.ilvokhin.com [178.62.254.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA56141C2F7 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.62.254.231 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772201049; cv=none; b=husDB6Wt6aNCUupXB2+PzGfb/SOrQCEAyb8Q/us44SA5A6kl27SXTmbdcBCkDE/g6/sBzO6BrsgymczRpREKsslJWsj0TQRshMMJqiP5mUeS8UMsDFgtlngWZAUW2vvrhKF/LzgI7yIg80JpT4DPqbU+VbII2Qr8C5u4zCEBl5Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772201049; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nQ2+Pdlb75SYzohhia7FaOO19ETgyo5Yr+FxV2UdtSk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UrAd/VOLp6MI7ws1nZy8zjSn3RwmAMlHi+5dvPn9dwAhOKKB3aW3YG52xg3sEVdpSP9ZPL2QtZ5vCAlh+Fg/9xbeU+osrBa4Ali3sVY4Bqhyvwm4WQ3HgS7uIxLYEXp266hKZzcgIy0DMJlZ8tahCne0dM/YohMP5yfqNDFfxR0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ilvokhin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ilvokhin.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilvokhin.com header.i=@ilvokhin.com header.b=jVizJJFD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.62.254.231 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ilvokhin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ilvokhin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilvokhin.com header.i=@ilvokhin.com header.b="jVizJJFD" Received: from shell.ilvokhin.com (shell.ilvokhin.com [138.68.190.75]) (Authenticated sender: d@ilvokhin.com) by mail.ilvokhin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9806B2E04; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:04:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ilvokhin.com; s=mail; t=1772201045; bh=lx8+fQOfM06FtrrbmzEJaLSTPfYA6pSRPgEx9FPa08M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jVizJJFD4ATD5CgtM64XfWCZHIVsGntdbUdeB5BdWnEBGtUrr52uEYsajBO7HrR9o kfGlEsFHI5B4cHBkEYT9O1eZ/5s3YlbPJMfIzXZvmibbFgcpp2VAtBX19v7hvbt5lD tP3EKoyi86Na3TAiW51Kq61rvkFXJtThozJt+c5o= Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:04:01 +0000 From: Dmitry Ilvokhin To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/irq: Optimize interrupts decimals printing Message-ID: References: <87ms0uz5ja.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87ms0uz5ja.ffs@tglx> On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 02:20:57PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25 2026 at 17:22, Dmitry Ilvokhin wrote: > > Sorry, this fell through the cracks. > > > I would like to follow up on this patch with additional data from production > > deployment. > > Instead of the non-interesting advertising blurb, you could have had the > courtesy to follow up with a new version of this patch after checking > whether it still applies, which it does not. > > But please spare the effort because I already fixed it up locally and > thereby looked at the larger picture of /proc/interrupts. > > It's amazing that all the people who "improve" that stuff never see the > obvious low hanging fruit there. I'll send out a series later. Hi Thomas, Thanks for taking a look and for fixing it up locally. I apologize for not checking whether the patch still applied before following up, that was my mistake. I'm glad to hear you're looking at the larger picture of /proc/interrupts. If there’s anything I can help with (testing, benchmarking, etc.), I'd be happy to assist. > > Thanks, > > tglx >