From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A18E23E8C60; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772228229; cv=none; b=SDoXfGvyuRFatMVY1Vgyu1ksRxIsHgE9vCi3aNBozXd7KYOnacwxKn65iNvkIrOjpy5YtPdrdDByaMsHz1RlR+QhGpfy+DRw55JHU/7bVLMloW+IBjJV+ZP6VKRBeYUi3tmYLfYfaGJmks800YSUsMy7bXTGnSJZz5EeuP3k2ms= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772228229; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5tXnhuCv52KCUVGltNH02leOmDs6VgPWcF8wP7DmfYs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=X35IXgLlso7mp0+/7/SogQ+afbxpQ9xRhqQJwEnaST+cJk8gGsCAeG5VYRPJSMLzDMX3jpdCMfCaTH5Ry87FYKxrSxVvVgNAetqUUZROw2dRprIcsZXZHqKrRbPWOmq304KrKSl6ZJpgCMaItuj0Me2Ocn5pukQkPm7TfGssHgQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=brwnEVJF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="brwnEVJF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69F60C19423; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772228229; bh=5tXnhuCv52KCUVGltNH02leOmDs6VgPWcF8wP7DmfYs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=brwnEVJFVllXBTc0ka5thA6S+i5EEMndcr/o6BMfob4vigY2t2NdfmuHLsnt8z9ja oWJW3HFgJ8uHkdFuEnJ6Pd3HxuJ5pXitMdCR4RDXR3uKnZL6ePhRD1v/bSJEL8m5y+ JCvM7AwH2wn2FREnGBH4573AWc2I4yb8CbOLfu3cMDGuhbY1rMrwqM5KzDFVlIZqnC B4LYNX5M91tqJOaPTR7fgzRpU8PSXET5nDueXto0aL6sBWZWVZ3+oDgD9kYau91r2y duJzvMjZJc08/XqShFFucHfmJoBCI40D1Rntj7MQCINhKl4bcIm1AcW2QutFvwJEXD BMeEm2JSoq5og== Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:37:05 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maher Sanalla Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/6] Add support for TLP emulation Message-ID: References: <20260225-var-tlp-v1-0-fe14a7ac7731@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260225-var-tlp-v1-0-fe14a7ac7731@nvidia.com> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:19:30PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > This series adds support for Transaction Layer Packet (TLP) emulation > response gateway regions, enabling userspace device emulation software > to write TLP responses directly to lower layers without kernel driver > involvement. > > Currently, the mlx5 driver exposes VirtIO emulation access regions via > the MLX5_IB_METHOD_VAR_OBJ_ALLOC ioctl. This series extends that > ioctl to also support allocating TLP response gateway channels for > PCI device emulation use cases. Sorry if this is obvious to people in the know, but could you possibly give a quick high level description of the use case behind this feature? I'm just curious what emulation needs are enabled by having access to this packet level. Thanks!