From: Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu/centaur: Disable X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE on Zhaoxin C4600
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 05:08:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaUbR-vuxmuRhAsC@pie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05f84fa5-d0df-4bab-80a6-5ff2c418b5ec@citrix.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 04:29:13PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/02/2026 5:37 pm, Yao Zi wrote:
> > Zhaoxin C4600, which names itself as CentaurHauls, claims
> > X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE support in CPUID, while execution of fsgsbase-
> > related instructions fails with #UD exception. This will cause kernel
> > to crash early in current_save_fsgs().
>
> #UD is the expected behaviour of the FSGS instructions if they're not
> enabled.
>
> Are you saying that this specific CPU enumerates FSGSBASE in CPUID, and
> permits setting CR4.FSGSBASE (without #GP for a reserved bit), and the
> FSGS instructions still do not function?
Yes. Without any workarounds, the kernel crashes in current_save_fsgs(),
which is the first use site of rdfsbase, instead of identify_cpu() where
CR4.FSGSBASE is set up.
> What happens if you read CR4 back after trying to set the bit?
CR4.FSGSBASE is set correctly, I wrote a small patch for testing,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 1c3261cae40c..d89a2cc71147 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -2048,8 +2048,13 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
setup_lass(c);
/* Enable FSGSBASE instructions if available. */
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE)) {
+ if (1) {
+ pr_info("%s: enabling FSGSBASE\n", __func__);
+ pr_info("%s: before enabling, CR4 = 0x%lx\n",
+ __func__, native_read_cr4());
cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE);
+ pr_info("%s: after enabling, CR4 = 0x%lx\n",
+ __func__, native_read_cr4());
elf_hwcap2 |= HWCAP2_FSGSBASE;
}
On BSP I got,
[ 0.298016] identify_cpu: enabling FSGSBASE
[ 0.298021] identify_cpu: before enabling, CR4 = 0x1200b0
[ 0.298027] identify_cpu: after enabling, CR4 = 0x1300b0
and on APs, CR4.FSGSBASE seems to be set by default,
[ 0.414981] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[ 0.415211] smpboot: x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[ 0.415219] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3
[ 0.001869] identify_cpu: enabling FSGSBASE
[ 0.001869] identify_cpu: before enabling, CR4 = 0x1706b0
[ 0.001869] identify_cpu: after enabling, CR4 = 0x1706b0
> ~Andrew
Regards,
Yao Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 17:37 [PATCH] x86/cpu/centaur: Disable X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE on Zhaoxin C4600 Yao Zi
2026-02-28 19:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-01 9:27 ` Yao Zi
2026-03-01 18:37 ` David Laight
2026-03-02 5:09 ` Yao Zi
2026-03-01 0:33 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-01 9:10 ` Yao Zi
2026-03-01 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-01 16:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-02 5:08 ` Yao Zi [this message]
2026-03-02 9:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-05 9:03 ` Tony W Wang-oc
2026-03-05 12:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-05 14:04 ` Yao Zi
2026-03-05 14:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-05 14:11 ` David Laight
2026-03-05 16:20 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12 2:14 ` Tony W Wang-oc
2026-03-12 15:52 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-17 7:41 ` Tony W Wang-oc
2026-03-17 15:21 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-18 3:44 ` Tony W Wang-oc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-05 20:26 Christian Ludloff
2026-03-12 2:18 ` Tony W Wang-oc
2026-03-12 16:31 ` Christian Ludloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaUbR-vuxmuRhAsC@pie \
--to=me@ziyao.cc \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox