From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
zhidao su <suzhidao@xiaomi.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the sched-ext tree with the tip tree
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 13:28:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aabiEPPiSuelemAG@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1681 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the sched-ext tree got a conflict in:
kernel/sched/ext.c
between commit:
c2a57380df9dd ("sched: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq")
from the tip tree and commit:
3f27958b729a2 ("sched_ext: Use READ_ONCE() for plain reads of scx_watchdog_timeout")
from the sched-ext tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc kernel/sched/ext.c
index a448a8407d8e0,b9247c9f0430b..0000000000000
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@@ -2762,8 -2848,8 +2848,8 @@@ static void scx_watchdog_workfn(struct
cond_resched();
}
- queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, to_delayed_work(work),
+ queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, to_delayed_work(work),
- scx_watchdog_timeout / 2);
+ READ_ONCE(scx_watchdog_timeout) / 2);
}
void scx_tick(struct rq *rq)
@@@ -5059,8 -5175,8 +5175,8 @@@ static int scx_enable(struct sched_ext_
WRITE_ONCE(scx_watchdog_timeout, timeout);
WRITE_ONCE(scx_watchdog_timestamp, jiffies);
- queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &scx_watchdog_work,
+ queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, &scx_watchdog_work,
- scx_watchdog_timeout / 2);
+ READ_ONCE(scx_watchdog_timeout) / 2);
/*
* Once __scx_enabled is set, %current can be switched to SCX anytime.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 13:28 Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-09 18:49 linux-next: manual merge of the sched-ext tree with the tip tree Mark Brown
2026-03-09 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-15 2:49 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-17 2:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-11 6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-11 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-22 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-01 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-01 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-04 17:42 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-01 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aabiEPPiSuelemAG@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzhidao@xiaomi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox