public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
@ 2025-12-24 16:13 Marco Crivellari
  2025-12-25 14:48 ` Corey Minyard
  2026-03-05 16:47 ` Marco Crivellari
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Crivellari @ 2025-12-24 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, openipmi-developer
  Cc: Tejun Heo, Lai Jiangshan, Frederic Weisbecker,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Marco Crivellari, Michal Hocko,
	Corey Minyard

This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:

   commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
   commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")

The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
optimized by the scheduler.

Before that to happen after a careful review and conversion of each individual
case, workqueue users must be converted to the better named new workqueues with
no intended behaviour changes:

   system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
   system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq

This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
removed in the future.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index 3f48fc6ab596..ebdc8f683981 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static int deliver_response(struct ipmi_smi *intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg)
 		mutex_lock(&intf->user_msgs_mutex);
 		list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->user_msgs);
 		mutex_unlock(&intf->user_msgs_mutex);
-		queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
+		queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
 	}
 
 	return rv;
@@ -4935,7 +4935,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
 	if (run_to_completion)
 		smi_work(&intf->smi_work);
 	else
-		queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
+		queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_smi_msg_received);
 
@@ -4945,7 +4945,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_watchdog_pretimeout(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
 		return;
 
 	atomic_set(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, 1);
-	queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
+	queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_smi_watchdog_pretimeout);
 
@@ -5115,7 +5115,7 @@ static bool ipmi_timeout_handler(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
 				       flags);
 	}
 
-	queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
+	queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
 
 	return need_timer;
 }
@@ -5171,7 +5171,7 @@ static void ipmi_timeout(struct timer_list *unused)
 	if (atomic_read(&stop_operation))
 		return;
 
-	queue_work(system_wq, &ipmi_timer_work);
+	queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &ipmi_timer_work);
 }
 
 static void need_waiter(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
  2025-12-24 16:13 [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
@ 2025-12-25 14:48 ` Corey Minyard
  2026-03-05 16:47 ` Marco Crivellari
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2025-12-25 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco Crivellari
  Cc: linux-kernel, openipmi-developer, Tejun Heo, Lai Jiangshan,
	Frederic Weisbecker, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Michal Hocko

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 05:13:01PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>    commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>    commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
> 
> Before that to happen after a careful review and conversion of each individual
> case, workqueue users must be converted to the better named new workqueues with
> no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>    system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>    system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.

This looks good to me.

Acked-by: Corey Minyard <corey@minyard.net>

> 
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> index 3f48fc6ab596..ebdc8f683981 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static int deliver_response(struct ipmi_smi *intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg)
>  		mutex_lock(&intf->user_msgs_mutex);
>  		list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->user_msgs);
>  		mutex_unlock(&intf->user_msgs_mutex);
> -		queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
> +		queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
>  	}
>  
>  	return rv;
> @@ -4935,7 +4935,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
>  	if (run_to_completion)
>  		smi_work(&intf->smi_work);
>  	else
> -		queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
> +		queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_smi_msg_received);
>  
> @@ -4945,7 +4945,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_watchdog_pretimeout(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
>  		return;
>  
>  	atomic_set(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, 1);
> -	queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
> +	queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_smi_watchdog_pretimeout);
>  
> @@ -5115,7 +5115,7 @@ static bool ipmi_timeout_handler(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
>  				       flags);
>  	}
>  
> -	queue_work(system_wq, &intf->smi_work);
> +	queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &intf->smi_work);
>  
>  	return need_timer;
>  }
> @@ -5171,7 +5171,7 @@ static void ipmi_timeout(struct timer_list *unused)
>  	if (atomic_read(&stop_operation))
>  		return;
>  
> -	queue_work(system_wq, &ipmi_timer_work);
> +	queue_work(system_percpu_wq, &ipmi_timer_work);
>  }
>  
>  static void need_waiter(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
  2025-12-24 16:13 [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
  2025-12-25 14:48 ` Corey Minyard
@ 2026-03-05 16:47 ` Marco Crivellari
  2026-03-05 16:54   ` Corey Minyard
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Crivellari @ 2026-03-05 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, openipmi-developer
  Cc: Tejun Heo, Lai Jiangshan, Frederic Weisbecker,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Michal Hocko, Corey Minyard

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 5:13 PM Marco Crivellari
<marco.crivellari@suse.com> wrote:
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Hi,

Gentle ping.

Thanks!

-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
  2026-03-05 16:47 ` Marco Crivellari
@ 2026-03-05 16:54   ` Corey Minyard
  2026-03-05 16:55     ` Marco Crivellari
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2026-03-05 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco Crivellari
  Cc: linux-kernel, openipmi-developer, Tejun Heo, Lai Jiangshan,
	Frederic Weisbecker, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Michal Hocko

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 05:47:42PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 5:13 PM Marco Crivellari
> <marco.crivellari@suse.com> wrote:
> >  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Gentle ping.

Ah, I thought you were putting it in your tree, so I just acked it.

It's in my next tree now.

-corey

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> 
> Marco Crivellari
> 
> L3 Support Engineer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
  2026-03-05 16:54   ` Corey Minyard
@ 2026-03-05 16:55     ` Marco Crivellari
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Crivellari @ 2026-03-05 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: corey
  Cc: linux-kernel, openipmi-developer, Tejun Heo, Lai Jiangshan,
	Frederic Weisbecker, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Michal Hocko

On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 5:54 PM Corey Minyard <corey@minyard.net> wrote:
>
> Ah, I thought you were putting it in your tree, so I just acked it.
>
> It's in my next tree now.

Ah, no problem btw.

Many thanks!

-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-05 16:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-24 16:13 [PATCH] ipmi: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-12-25 14:48 ` Corey Minyard
2026-03-05 16:47 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-05 16:54   ` Corey Minyard
2026-03-05 16:55     ` Marco Crivellari

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox