Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] replace old wq(s), add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue

[Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 01:53:58PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 04:04:32PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 11:00 AM Marco Crivellari
> > <marco.crivellari@suse.com> wrote:
> > > Marco Crivellari (3):
> > >   drm/i915: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
> > >   drm/i915: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq in the
> > >     documentation
> > >   drm/i915: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
> > 
> > Gentle ping.
> > I checked patchwork and seems still in the "New" state.
> 
> Please ignore patchwork status.
> 
> Both patches queued towards the next merge window targeting 7.1
> 
> fa171b805f25 ("drm/xe: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq")
> 0bc2c2e1a388 ("drm/xe: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users")

doh! please ignore me.

The similar subject titles confused me.

I just pushed this i915 series to drm-intel-next.

Now, also queued for 7.1 along with the xe above.

c15d0056fb74 drm/i915: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
4fb289d352e3 drm/i915: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq in the documentation
36ed3648a2f3 drm/i915: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq

> 
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Marco Crivellari
> > 
> > L3 Support Engineer