From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1901436C58C for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 19:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772824072; cv=none; b=BtXWNQ8+d4vOtQk+iEhwqRJ/tZ7YhNef5a1K+/74Uq+jE7yPZ++Cpt0kgSXKZTxdFOBJX327yo+qlvHrBHOTUVPagZsLDxq19II9cOAy8H/W+pdDvX/4ZIfkA3Ur7OZS+8JFM+H7qDWHHk0HQ2OGz0/1ezLszs9DvRL8F5sJ7q0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772824072; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gH42ijFdRn9m5XHz8z4s+KqRbi3q7AAWhpjOAyKbpOE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Wpr/VBAqJ3QL5C046cK2tg6n0E7fVriZcSOXXi8vMcsea2fj8uG07h7lrUarZ9eMQFiA2Gt4V1iEtg0IThrv/meMhu7peQIwnunJ0/Xgs3L0ZuRuG38amTQl24TV6pkteun5rUa6Dz9qoyLiGSdWL58Bg9eW2haXpJ8aQ+Z1Uic= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Fu6+Ju1Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Fu6+Ju1Q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772824071; x=1804360071; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gH42ijFdRn9m5XHz8z4s+KqRbi3q7AAWhpjOAyKbpOE=; b=Fu6+Ju1QYRVOViko2Tr7+8rGiv/gZ0pQWWG7ZPk8StpOCgrxjic2yYR9 cYw9xsrJMqbUA1cfYyRidnT2TEgKTysydMOmmJCG/pKn3rBDJ4E1g+jsM l+LBT2A5YUd9kHeLp62ZKJau8K92BO6omDOQTruhyF2tBQmy2B3egVQWQ SoRvygRdHtMSuzQqkaQHtqKdBFcC4R4hrsqqcfM3YDAS9Bwp636SPwtH4 4O9H5Xpvh3EkxvEA2zZRb7gUdPfR/N9AmiMwVTLV52DxWTSzN/Dn5Ax1y Q0EjOQFML1gRaXKfZR9sGj973zrPuI1vBHoxP9jo/jauSQe6r/b4Qea1y g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qdUs1XYwQ/aqFnailvP1dQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: w8Kd/6NwTryN7rXc6p0y3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11721"; a="84265865" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,105,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="84265865" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2026 11:07:51 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: C9BHulQsS5GprW/trZCxSw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: z32YjKQVSfqCEQkYtvPKxA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,105,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="215747359" Received: from abityuts-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.1]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2026 11:07:49 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 21:07:46 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Josh Law Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Law Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/uuid: fix typo "reversion" to "revision" in comment Message-ID: References: <20260306161250.2811500-1-objecting@objecting.org> <52447e87-f013-4dc9-8abf-a52acaf6304a@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52447e87-f013-4dc9-8abf-a52acaf6304a@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 07:03:57PM +0000, Josh Law wrote: > 6 Mar 2026 19:00:09 Andy Shevchenko : > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 04:12:50PM +0000, Josh Law wrote: > >> Fix a typo in __uuid_gen_common() where "reversion" (meaning to revert) > >> was used instead of "revision" when describing the UUID variant field. > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Andrew has already merged this patch, you will have to inquire with him to > add your reviewed by It's up to his process. I know that it's possible. In any case I'm listed as designated reviewer, this tag formally confirms that I agree with the change and it is good code wise from my point of view. Please, read Submitting Patches documentation to clarify this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko