From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Chao Shi <cshi008@fiu.edu>,
Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>, Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: fix memory allocation in nvme_pr_read_keys()
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:23:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab0uNATxCVlnKi2p@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228001927.382810-3-iam@sung-woo.kim>
We were reveiwing CVEs and this patch doesn't really fix the problem.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 07:19:28PM -0500, Sungwoo Kim wrote:
> nvme_pr_read_keys() takes num_keys from userspace and uses it to
> calculate the allocation size for rse via struct_size(). The upper
> limit is PR_KEYS_MAX (64K).
>
> A malicious or buggy userspace can pass a large num_keys value that
> results in a 4MB allocation attempt at most, causing a warning in
> the page allocator when the order exceeds MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
>
> To fix this, use kvzalloc() instead of kzalloc().
>
> This bug has the same reasoning and fix with the patch below:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20251212013510.3576091-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/
We never merged this patch. The fix that went in was correct.
It is commit a58383fa45c7 ("block: add allocation size check in
blkdev_pr_read_keys()").
>
> Warning log:
> WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5216 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x5aa/0x2300 mm/page_alloc.c:5216, CPU#1: syz-executor117/272
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 272 Comm: syz-executor117 Not tainted 6.19.0 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x5aa/0x2300 mm/page_alloc.c:5216
> Code: ff 83 bd a8 fe ff ff 0a 0f 86 69 fb ff ff 0f b6 1d f9 f9 c4 04 80 fb 01 0f 87 3b 76 30 ff 83 e3 01 75 09 c6 05 e4 f9 c4 04 01 <0f> 0b 48 c7 85 70 fe ff ff 00 00 00 00 e9 8f fd ff ff 31 c0 e9 0d
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fcf450 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1ffff920001f9ea0
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000b RDI: 0000000000040dc0
> RBP: ffffc90000fcf648 R08: ffff88800b6c3380 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: ffffc90000fcf840 R11: ffff88807ffad280 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000040dc0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffc90000fcf620
> FS: 0000555565db33c0(0000) GS:ffff8880be26c000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000000002000000c CR3: 0000000003b72000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> alloc_pages_mpol+0x236/0x4d0 mm/mempolicy.c:2486
> alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x149/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2557
> ___kmalloc_large_node+0x10c/0x140 mm/slub.c:5598
> __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x25/0xc0 mm/slub.c:5629
> __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:5645 [inline]
> __kmalloc_noprof+0x483/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:5669
> kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:961 [inline]
> kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1094 [inline]
> nvme_pr_read_keys+0x8f/0x4c0 drivers/nvme/host/pr.c:245
> blkdev_pr_read_keys block/ioctl.c:456 [inline]
> blkdev_common_ioctl+0x1b71/0x29b0 block/ioctl.c:730
> blkdev_ioctl+0x299/0x700 block/ioctl.c:786
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:583 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1bf/0x220 fs/ioctl.c:583
> x64_sys_call+0x1280/0x21b0 mnt/fuzznvme_1/fuzznvme/linux-build/v6.19/./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x71/0x330 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> RIP: 0033:0x7fb893d3108d
> Code: 28 c3 e8 46 1e 00 00 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffff61f2f38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffff61f3138 RCX: 00007fb893d3108d
> RDX: 0000000020000040 RSI: 00000000c01070ce RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffff61f3138
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: 00007ffff61f3128 R14: 00007fb893dae530 R15: 0000000000000001
> </TASK>
>
> Fixes: 5fd96a4e15de (nvme: Add pr_ops read_keys support)
> Acked-by: Chao Shi <cshi008@fiu.edu>
> Acked-by: Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
> Acked-by: Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
> ---
> v2: add missing kvfree
>
> drivers/nvme/host/pr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
> index ad2ecc2f49a97..fe7dbe2648158 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_read_keys(struct block_device *bdev,
> if (rse_len > U32_MAX)
> return -EINVAL;
This "rse_len > U32_MAX" check is kind of nonsense. Anything larger
than INT_MAX will trigger a stack trace (which is the bug that this
patch is trying to fix).
Copy the other fix for blkdev_pr_read_keys().
regards,
dan carpenter
>
> - rse = kzalloc(rse_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + rse = kvzalloc(rse_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rse)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_read_keys(struct block_device *bdev,
> }
>
> free_rse:
> - kfree(rse);
> + kvfree(rse);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 0:19 [PATCH v2] nvme: fix memory allocation in nvme_pr_read_keys() Sungwoo Kim
2026-03-02 6:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-02 13:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-02 15:53 ` Keith Busch
2026-03-20 11:23 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-03-20 15:40 ` Sungwoo Kim
2026-03-21 7:19 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab0uNATxCVlnKi2p@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cshi008@fiu.edu \
--cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox