public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Chao Shi <cshi008@fiu.edu>,
	Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>, Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: fix memory allocation in nvme_pr_read_keys()
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 10:19:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab5GcjyKnKnqQ7ob@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJNyHpJm8rwivxM2bSvRoqi_yCeFTyXVY+z0oub4Uc8stUN55A@mail.gmail.com>

Ah, yes.  You're right.  It's the nonsense:

	if (rse_len > U32_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;

check which confused me.  Commit a58383fa45c7 ("block: add allocation
size check in blkdev_pr_read_keys()") caps num_keys at 65536 so the
rse_len can't be more than 4MB which is less than INT_MAX (2GB).  We
could remove that check.

I will send a patch to do that.

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-28  0:19 [PATCH v2] nvme: fix memory allocation in nvme_pr_read_keys() Sungwoo Kim
2026-03-02  6:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-02 13:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-02 15:53 ` Keith Busch
2026-03-20 11:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-03-20 15:40   ` Sungwoo Kim
2026-03-21  7:19     ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab5GcjyKnKnqQ7ob@stanley.mountain \
    --to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cshi008@fiu.edu \
    --cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox