From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21453BADB1 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773180423; cv=none; b=PImNvJ0yBISpbd3CPZW+yt2YjlVdercaTiwE0SKoGt5QRqXHUKXHNoSaMCXztjLE56s7KicfijNcxKoFm9e/mHDgDcadLFziIe6TZnPkLxK6fjQaQHXJYwwBPqDahoAIxG+RXArb0rggQvp3Lhuih9rPikC6xJ4zR72zLiMaeHo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773180423; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KR88W6/3MEUiySLgVOsnO8U+amFoVaHSYPrt1wBRuzY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sOrhiEDbzW5SVu4ni+ccFBAaqGZsSUoQbrw1ahsr3/DQMUJ8i7TxDmbKWZCo2uisH+SFuXvVNmvZC7+KGGE6rkTfYcICVJxmtuO1WapTe3Cm9Mq0/2xQmBzEjoQdema1uQNtx6NOY10doaW4Rd8i/v67HK/1IXRpzMRGZQPz5ng= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=KJmd+kH3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="KJmd+kH3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=LkUL HWuXg79SODw2AYpCKh0d7QmHHmvq0tOokfU4XyY=; b=KJmd+kH3qVuUCWxlIf01 WOXGCq5oOEkuH77UFLC9wvreGRDLEQKS+SWl/SwG8NalPAq/vNlNDd+aKQqRlmwn ws1bP+cj7RkRUuqMlAIGYafNtJG5c3K9X78npG6pHs2YIM9uilpmS44PJM43ShvN cc5W3ygeZhtSxa8/C1ijSPaATbPQux7gh+RK7P7JwOg6vCmsFVrR7vengFGdpm3a g5I09otRpB6uH2PZHYMcEib5NT4QZXOcqo8ZZVClK85krt+U0Bf60knB/QXzEMah 9yxaZ7JTUKmsQQKpjdhKBDIY5cPzYvwFNtfQeO0BhJP6UcfVvX2xr+ZxGnTeDXZF MQ== Received: (qmail 3386356 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2026 23:06:58 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 10 Mar 2026 23:06:58 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@a4H0vLJMpo4ujntP Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 23:06:57 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add #address-cells in the GIC node Message-ID: References: <20260303102029.147359-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0oKhQnZxzxJhR7xj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260303102029.147359-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> --0oKhQnZxzxJhR7xj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)= wrote: > When checking dts involving the r9a06g032.dtsi file, the following kind > of warnings are reported: > Missing property '#address-cells' in node xxx, using 0 as fallback >=20 > Indeed, #address-cells is not present in the GIC interrupt controller > node. >=20 > Fix it adding the missing property. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) How did you trigger this? It doesn't show up with the upstream DTs for N1D. Can you share the snippet which causes the problem for you? --0oKhQnZxzxJhR7xj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmmwlgEACgkQFA3kzBSg KbapNBAArlx6+fZzy6x/ZhTmzNm6zv5TwMGDBiWn85GGGiIPi31Jj23+41GRsv6a HKKGYCwjGn8OZRF6sZaXVMoEGKzezguBwm7Lz5x/T2+vaa0HhC1BGcyv7471auE5 F1373FTD7xzuPjgg+5KwiXZhQKjmcLZhaKomYsc8V/ElBsz1hxkIIQ8E7FKVD4YQ 43N4jLsWkMcmeagzOuFk8mR+mcU3ZUm0KRnlGz3ot8TGP9ufwq6ZV0w6BEcoIVH9 C3fLOJaozP55cvJsW9SwEl9ylKsOJwNrY2hsfskH7w4q6V2ElEtpmLiZxJ5J25ND Gl2vTa+8KQ1Cq+HpbLeluLk4Re0oEsYYDT7f6YrCNsub05s1gQwOzz7NnUOzWPjl OcN7Hj22W1pGH/KFIG73/NP9mi/ZN0HezAQ+YdTYn/Tjv8TZFLSrMEGxGUZh/RUh 2epsuwlhl5bVFNz7ZLxT4FPn3MPooPnTw9kiW8Kx9TSCOVe608dfEusqZMq0eSb0 5fGogBXI9HwSm1YffYCRv35/VPzMcsGL4O6WUwVf8PEC6ZtHGgXAJtk8122wKIcK p009s25pSlPF6t+oLxUb2zF6a8OBuXb+O6RlXjsoQm+B0z09TW69eNuzKpuiTPKc HuIFiz34ZWWjNPUNIlICWHKmkzh4IkPVSa+IW5Bl/eOoe0CnFFI= =Rc5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0oKhQnZxzxJhR7xj--