Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] selftests/mm: transhuge_stress: skip the test when thp not available

[Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 08:46:23PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/12/26 12:40, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> > The test requires thp, skip the test when thp is not available to avoid
> > false positive.
> > 
> > Tested with thp disabled kernel.
> > Before the fix:
> >   # --------------------------------
> >   # running ./transhuge-stress -d 20
> >   # --------------------------------
> >   # TAP version 13
> >   # 1..1
> >   # transhuge-stress: allocate 1453 transhuge pages, using 2907 MiB virtual memory and 11 MiB of ram
> >   # Bail out! MADV_HUGEPAGE# Planned tests != run tests (1 != 0)
> >   # # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> >   # [FAIL]
> >   not ok 60 transhuge-stress -d 20 # exit=1
> > 
> > After the fix:
> >   # --------------------------------
> >   # running ./transhuge-stress -d 20
> >   # --------------------------------
> >   # 1..0 # SKIP Transparent Hugepages not available
> >   # [SKIP]
> >   ok 5 transhuge-stress -d 20 # SKIP
> > 
> > CC: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c
> > index bcad47c09518..76316696426d 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >  #include <sys/mman.h>
> >  #include "vm_util.h"
> >  #include "kselftest.h"
> > +#include "thp_settings.h"
> >  
> >  int backing_fd = -1;
> >  int mmap_flags = MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE | MAP_PRIVATE;
> > @@ -35,6 +36,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >  	int pagemap_fd;
> >  	int duration = 0;
> >  
> > +	if (!thp_is_enabled())
> > +		ksft_exit_skip("Transparent Hugepages not available\n");
> > +
> >  	ksft_print_header();
> 
> Shouldn't that go under the ksft_print_header(), like you did in patch #3?

It will print the TAP version. I'll change in v2 as you suggested. Thanks!

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
>